Skip to content


United States Vs. Terminal Railroad Assn, St. Louis - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number361 U.S. 116
AppellantUnited States
RespondentTerminal Railroad Assn, St. Louis
Excerpt:
.....states v. terminal railroad assn, st. louis - 361 u.s. 116 (1959) u.s. supreme court united states v. terminal railroad assn, st. louis, 361 u.s. 116 (1959) 361 u.s. 116 united states v. terminal railroad association of st. louis. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit. no. 24. decided november 23, 1959. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. reported below: 260 f.2d 884 . solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general anderson, beatrice rosenberg and j. f. bishop for the united states. norman j. gundlach and john c. roberts for respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed......
Judgment:
UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSN, ST. LOUIS - 361 U.S. 116 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSN, ST. LOUIS, 361 U.S. 116 (1959) 361 U.S. 116

UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 24.
Decided November 23, 1959.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 260 F.2d 884 .

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop for the United States.

Norman J. Gundlach and John C. Roberts for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. United States v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co., ante, p. 78.


LaPORTE v. NEW YORK, <a href="/99567"> 361 U.S. 116 </a> (1959) 361 U.S. 116 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court LaPORTE v. NEW YORK, 361 U.S. 116 (1959) 361 U.S. 116

LaPORTE ET AL. v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF NEW YORK.
No. 425.
Decided November 23, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 6 N. Y. 2d 1, 159 N. E. 540.

Dante M. Scaccia for appellants.

Paxton Blair, Solicitor General of New York, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 116, 117




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //