Skip to content


Tri-city Broadcasting Co. Vs. Bowers - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number361 U.S. 97
AppellantTri-city Broadcasting Co.
RespondentBowers
Excerpt:
tri-city broadcasting co. v. bowers - 361 u.s. 97 (1959) u.s. supreme court tri-city broadcasting co. v. bowers, 361 u.s. 97 (1959) 361 u.s. 97 tri-city broadcasting co. v. bowers, tax commissioner of ohio. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 406. decided november 16, 1959. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 169 ohio st. 126, 158 n. e. 2d 203. carlton s. dargusch, carlton s. dargusch, jr. and jack h. bertsch for appellant. mark mcelroy, attorney general of ohio, and joseph d. karam, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 361 u.s. 97, 98
Judgment:
TRI-CITY BROADCASTING CO. v. BOWERS - 361 U.S. 97 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court TRI-CITY BROADCASTING CO. v. BOWERS, 361 U.S. 97 (1959) 361 U.S. 97

TRI-CITY BROADCASTING CO. v. BOWERS, TAX COMMISSIONER OF OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 406.
Decided November 16, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 169 Ohio St. 126, 158 N. E. 2d 203.

Carlton S. Dargusch, Carlton S. Dargusch, Jr. and Jack H. Bertsch for appellant.

Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Joseph D. Karam, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 97, 98




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //