Skip to content


Tahiti Bar, Inc., Vs. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number361 U.S. 85
AppellantTahiti Bar, Inc.,
RespondentPennsylvania Liquor Control Board
Excerpt:
tahiti bar, inc., v. pennsylvania liquor control board - 361 u.s. 85 (1959) u.s. supreme court tahiti bar, inc., v. pennsylvania liquor control board, 361 u.s. 85 (1959) 361 u.s. 85 tahiti bar, inc., v. pennsylvania liquor control board et al. appeal from the supreme court of pennsylvania. no. 363. decided november 9, 1959. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 395 pa. 355, 150 a. 2d 112. edwin p. rome for appellant. anne x. alpern, attorney general of pennsylvania, lois g. forer, deputy attorney general, george g. lindsay, assistant attorney general, and russell c. wismer, special assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is.....
Judgment:
TAHITI BAR, INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD - 361 U.S. 85 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court TAHITI BAR, INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, 361 U.S. 85 (1959) 361 U.S. 85

TAHITI BAR, INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 363.
Decided November 9, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 395 Pa. 355, 150 A. 2d 112.

Edwin P. Rome for appellant.

Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Lois G. Forer, Deputy Attorney General, George G. Lindsay, Assistant Attorney General, and Russell C. Wismer, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


LEHIGH CASINO, v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, <a href="/99573"> 361 U.S. 85 </a> (1959) 361 U.S. 85 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court LEHIGH CASINO, v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, 361 U.S. 85 (1959) 361 U.S. 85

LEHIGH CASINO, INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 379.
Decided November 9, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 395 Pa. 355, 150 A. 2d 112.

Henry I. Jacobson for appellant.

Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Lois G. Forer, Deputy Attorney General, George G. Lindsay, Assistant Attorney General, and Russell C. Wismer, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 85, 86




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //