Skip to content


Safeway Trails, Inc., Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number361 U.S. 86
AppellantSafeway Trails, Inc.,
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
safeway trails, inc., v. united states - 361 u.s. 86 (1959) u.s. supreme court safeway trails, inc., v. united states, 361 u.s. 86 (1959) 361 u.s. 86 safeway trails, inc., v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia. no. 375. decided november 9, 1959. 176 f. supp. 201, affirmed. william a. roberts and maxwell a. howell for appellant. solicitor general rankin, acting assistant attorney general bicks, richard a. solomon, john c. danielson, robert w. ginnane and arthur j. cerra for the united states and the interstate commerce commission, and frank b. hand, jr. for baltimore and annapolis railroad co., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is.....
Judgment:
SAFEWAY TRAILS, INC., v. UNITED STATES - 361 U.S. 86 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court SAFEWAY TRAILS, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 361 U.S. 86 (1959) 361 U.S. 86

SAFEWAY TRAILS, INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 375.
Decided November 9, 1959.

176 F. Supp. 201, affirmed.

William A. Roberts and Maxwell A. Howell for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, John C. Danielson, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Frank B. Hand, Jr. for Baltimore and Annapolis Railroad Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


GLOVER v. MICHIGAN, <a href="/99574"> 361 U.S. 86 </a> (1959) 361 U.S. 86 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court GLOVER v. MICHIGAN, 361 U.S. 86 (1959) 361 U.S. 86

GLOVER v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 265, Misc.
Decided November 9, 1959.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 361 U.S. 86, 87




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //