Skip to content


Memorial Gardens Assn. Vs. Smith - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number361 U.S. 31
AppellantMemorial Gardens Assn.
RespondentSmith
Excerpt:
memorial gardens assn. v. smith - 361 u.s. 31 (1959) u.s. supreme court memorial gardens assn. v. smith, 361 u.s. 31 (1959) 361 u.s. 31 memorial gardens association, inc., et al. v. smith, auditor of public accounts of illinois, et al. appeal from the supreme court of illinois. no. 288. decided october 19, 1959. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 16 ill. 2d 116, 156 n. e. 2d 587. c. severin buschmann and roy p. hull for appellants. grenville beardsley, attorney general of illinois, and william c. wines, raymond s. sarnow and a. zola groves, assistant attorneys general, for appellees. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 361 u.s......
Judgment:
MEMORIAL GARDENS ASSN. v. SMITH - 361 U.S. 31 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court MEMORIAL GARDENS ASSN. v. SMITH, 361 U.S. 31 (1959) 361 U.S. 31

MEMORIAL GARDENS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL. v. SMITH, AUDITOR OF
PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 288.
Decided October 19, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 16 Ill. 2d 116, 156 N. E. 2d 587.

C. Severin Buschmann and Roy P. Hull for appellants.

Grenville Beardsley, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Raymond S. Sarnow and A. Zola Groves, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 31, 32




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //