Skip to content


Magnet Cove Barium Corp. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number361 U.S. 32
AppellantMagnet Cove Barium Corp.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
magnet cove barium corp. v. united states - 361 u.s. 32 (1959) u.s. supreme court magnet cove barium corp. v. united states, 361 u.s. 32 (1959) 361 u.s. 32 magnet cove barium corp. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of texas. no. 296. decided october 19, 1959. 175 f. supp. 473, affirmed. frank a. leffingwell for appellant. solicitor general rankin, acting assistant attorney general bicks, richard a. solomon, robert w. ginnane and francis a. silver for the united states and the interstate commerce commission, and eldon martin for the chicago, burlington & quincy railroad co. et al., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is.....
Judgment:
MAGNET COVE BARIUM CORP. v. UNITED STATES - 361 U.S. 32 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court MAGNET COVE BARIUM CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 361 U.S. 32 (1959) 361 U.S. 32

MAGNET COVE BARIUM CORP. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 296.
Decided October 19, 1959.

175 F. Supp. 473, affirmed.

Frank A. Leffingwell for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Eldon Martin for the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 361 U.S. 32, 33




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //