Skip to content


Berkshire Associates Vs. New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number361 U.S. 3
AppellantBerkshire Associates
RespondentNew York
Excerpt:
berkshire associates v. new york - 361 u.s. 3 (1959) u.s. supreme court berkshire associates v. new york, 361 u.s. 3 (1959) 361 u.s. 3 berkshire fine spinning associates, inc., v. city of new york et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 272. decided october 12, 1959. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 5 n. y. 2d 347, 157 n. e. 2d 614. truman henson for appellant. stanley buchsbaum for appellees. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice harlan and mr. justice whittaker are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 361 u.s. 3, 4
Judgment:
BERKSHIRE ASSOCIATES v. NEW YORK - 361 U.S. 3 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court BERKSHIRE ASSOCIATES v. NEW YORK, 361 U.S. 3 (1959) 361 U.S. 3

BERKSHIRE FINE SPINNING ASSOCIATES, INC., v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 272.
Decided October 12, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 5 N. Y. 2d 347, 157 N. E. 2d 614.

Truman Henson for appellant.

Stanley Buchsbaum for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 361 U.S. 3, 4




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //