Skip to content


Beard Vs. Ohio - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number361 U.S. 4
AppellantBeard
RespondentOhio
Excerpt:
beard v. ohio - 361 u.s. 4 (1959) u.s. supreme court beard v. ohio, 361 u.s. 4 (1959) 361 u.s. 4 beard v. ohio. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of ohio. no. 2, misc. decided october 12, 1959. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. petitioner pro se. mark mcelroy, attorney general of ohio, and william m. vance, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is reversed. burns v. ohio, 360 u.s. 252 . mr. justice stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 361 u.s. 4, 5
Judgment:
BEARD v. OHIO - 361 U.S. 4 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court BEARD v. OHIO, 361 U.S. 4 (1959) 361 U.S. 4

BEARD v. OHIO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 2, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1959.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Petitioner pro se.

Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and William M. Vance, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Burns v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 252 .

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 361 U.S. 4, 5




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //