Skip to content


Eastern States Petroleum Corp. Vs. Rogers - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number361 U.S. 7
AppellantEastern States Petroleum Corp.
RespondentRogers
Excerpt:
.....eastern states petroleum corp. v. rogers - 361 u.s. 7 (1959) u.s. supreme court eastern states petroleum corp. v. rogers, 361 u.s. 7 (1959) 361 u.s. 7 eastern states petroleum corp. v. rogers, attorney general, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia. no. 70. decided october 12, 1959. appeal dismissed. gerard r. moran and edwin g. martin for appellant. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general doub, alan s. rosenthal and seymour farber for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. castellano v. commission of investigation, new york, 361 u.s. 7 (1959) 361 u.s. 7 (1959) "> u.s. supreme court castellano v......
Judgment:
EASTERN STATES PETROLEUM CORP. v. ROGERS - 361 U.S. 7 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court EASTERN STATES PETROLEUM CORP. v. ROGERS, 361 U.S. 7 (1959) 361 U.S. 7

EASTERN STATES PETROLEUM CORP. v. ROGERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 70.
Decided October 12, 1959.

Appeal dismissed.

Gerard R. Moran and Edwin G. Martin for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Alan S. Rosenthal and Seymour Farber for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.


CASTELLANO v. COMMISSION OF INVESTIGATION, NEW YORK, <a href="/99593"> 361 U.S. 7 </a> (1959) 361 U.S. 7 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court CASTELLANO v. COMMISSION OF INVESTIGATION, NEW YORK, 361 U.S. 7 (1959) 361 U.S. 7

CASTELLANO v. COMMISSION OF INVESTIGATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 72.
Decided October 12, 1959.

Appeal dismissed as moot.

Reported below: 5 N. Y. 2d 1026, 6 N. Y. 2d 753, 878: 158 N. E. 2d 250, 159 N. E. 2d 201, 160 N. E. 2d 125.

Osmond K. Fraenkel for appellant.

Eliot H. Lumbard, Nathan Skolnik and Arnold M. Weiss for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to file supplement to the motion to dismiss is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed as moot.

Page 361 U.S. 7, 8




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //