Skip to content


Hershey Mfg. Co. Vs. Adamowski - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number360 U.S. 717
AppellantHershey Mfg. Co.
RespondentAdamowski
Excerpt:
.....350 u.s. 485 , we accept its finding that there was no showing of irreparable injury. degregory v. wyman, 360 u.s. 717 (1959) 360 u.s. 717 (1959) "> u.s. supreme court degregory v. wyman, 360 u.s. 717 (1959) 360 u.s. 717 degregory v. wyman, attorney general of new hampshire. appeal from the supreme court of new hampshire. no. 7, misc. decided june 29, 1959. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. appellant pro se. louis c. wyman, attorney general of new hampshire, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. the chief justice, mr. justice black and mr. justice douglas would note probable.....
Judgment:
HERSHEY MFG. CO. v. ADAMOWSKI - 360 U.S. 717 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court HERSHEY MFG. CO. v. ADAMOWSKI, 360 U.S. 717 (1959) 360 U.S. 717

HERSHEY MFG. CO. v. ADAMOWSKI ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 944.
Decided June 29, 1959.

Judgment affirmed.

Maurice J. Walsh, John J. Yowell and G. Kent Yowell for appellant.

Benjamin S. Adamowski for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. Although the District Court had jurisdiction, Doud v. Hodge, 350 U.S. 485 , we accept its finding that there was no showing of irreparable injury.


DeGREGORY v. WYMAN, <a href="/99614"> 360 U.S. 717 </a> (1959) 360 U.S. 717 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court DeGREGORY v. WYMAN, 360 U.S. 717 (1959) 360 U.S. 717

DeGREGORY v. WYMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
No. 7, Misc.
Decided June 29, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Appellant pro se.

Louis C. Wyman, Attorney General of New Hampshire, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would note probable jurisdiction.

Page 360 U.S. 717, 1




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //