Skip to content


Petersen Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number360 U.S. 314
AppellantPetersen
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of california. no. 830. decided june 15, 1959. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 51 cal. 2d 177, 331 p.2d 24. marvin e. lewis for appellant. stanley mosk, attorney general of california, clarence a. linn, assistant attorney general, arlo e. smith, deputy attorney general, dion holm and george baglin for appellee. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. ortega v. bibb, 360 u.s. 314 (1959) 360 u.s. 314 (1959) "> u.s. supreme court ortega v. bibb, 360 u.s. 314 (1959) 360 u.s. 314 ortega v. bibb, director of the department of public safety, et al. appeal from the united states.....
Judgment:
PETERSEN v. CALIFORNIA - 360 U.S. 314 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court PETERSEN v. CALIFORNIA, 360 U.S. 314 (1959) 360 U.S. 314

PETERSEN v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 830.
Decided June 15, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 51 Cal. 2d 177, 331 P.2d 24.

Marvin E. Lewis for appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, Dion Holm and George Baglin for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


ORTEGA v. BIBB, <a href="/99634"> 360 U.S. 314 </a> (1959) 360 U.S. 314 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court ORTEGA v. BIBB, 360 U.S. 314 (1959) 360 U.S. 314

ORTEGA v. BIBB, DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 790, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1959.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 360 U.S. 314, 315




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //