Skip to content


Ford Motor Co. Vs. Park - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number360 U.S. 251
AppellantFord Motor Co.
RespondentPark
Excerpt:
ford motor co. v. park - 360 u.s. 251 (1959) u.s. supreme court ford motor co. v. park, 360 u.s. 251 (1959) 360 u.s. 251 ford motor co. v. park et al. appeal from the supreme court of michigan. no. 831. decided june 8, 1959. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 355 mich. 103, 94 n. w. 2d 407. william t. gossett and l. homer surbeck for appellant. abraham l. zwerdling and harold a. cranefield for park et al., appellees. paul l. adams, attorney general of michigan, stanton s. faville, chief assistant attorney general, and samuel j. torina, solicitor general, for the attorney general of michigan, appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for.....
Judgment:
FORD MOTOR CO. v. PARK - 360 U.S. 251 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court FORD MOTOR CO. v. PARK, 360 U.S. 251 (1959) 360 U.S. 251

FORD MOTOR CO. v. PARK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 831.
Decided June 8, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 355 Mich. 103, 94 N. W. 2d 407.

William T. Gossett and L. Homer Surbeck for appellant.

Abraham L. Zwerdling and Harold A. Cranefield for Park et al., appellees.

Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, Stanton S. Faville, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, for the Attorney General of Michigan, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 360 U.S. 251, 252




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //