Skip to content


Southern Pacific Vs. Corporation Commission of Arizona - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number359 U.S. 532
AppellantSouthern Pacific
RespondentCorporation Commission of Arizona
Excerpt:
.....et al. appeal from the supreme court of arizona. no. 763. decided may 25, 1959. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 84 ariz. 365, 329 p.2d 883. george l. buland, burton mason and randolph karr for appellant. wade church, attorney general of arizona, wm. s. andrews, assistant attorney general, and stanley w. trachta for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. rodgers v. utah, 359 u.s. 532 (1959) 359 u.s. 532 (1959) "> u.s. supreme court rodgers v. utah, 359 u.s. 532 (1959) 359 u.s. 532 rodgers v. utah. appeal from the supreme court of utah. no. 695, misc. decided.....
Judgment:
SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF ARIZONA - 359 U.S. 532 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, 359 U.S. 532 (1959) 359 U.S. 532

SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF ARIZONA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 763.
Decided May 25, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 84 Ariz. 365, 329 P.2d 883.

George L. Buland, Burton Mason and Randolph Karr for appellant.

Wade Church, Attorney General of Arizona, Wm. S. Andrews, Assistant Attorney General, and Stanley W. Trachta for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


RODGERS v. UTAH, <a href="/99656"> 359 U.S. 532 </a> (1959) 359 U.S. 532 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court RODGERS v. UTAH, 359 U.S. 532 (1959) 359 U.S. 532

RODGERS v. UTAH.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF UTAH.
No. 695, Misc.
Decided May 25, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 8 Utah 2d 156, 329 P.2d 1075.

Lewis J. Wallace for appellant.

E. R. Callister, Attorney General of Utah, and Raymond W. Gee, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 359 U.S. 532, 533




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //