Skip to content


DEVRiES Vs. BAUMGARTNER'S ELECTRiC CONSTRUCTiON CO. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number359 U.S. 498
AppellantDEVRiES
RespondentBAUMGARTNER'S ELECTRiC CONSTRUCTiON CO.
Excerpt:
.....sherman and joseph m. stone for petitioners. melvin t. woods for respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. the judgment is reversed. san diego building trades council v. garmon, ante, p. 236. mr. justice clark, mr. justice harlan, mr. justice whittaker, and mr. justice stewart dissent for the reasons set forth in the concurring opinion in san diego building trades council v. garmon, ante, pp. 236, 249. anderson v. city of cedar rapids, 359 u.s. 498 (1959) 359 u.s. 498 (1959) "> u.s. supreme court anderson v. city of cedar rapids, 359 u.s. 498 (1959) 359 u.s. 498 anderson et al. v. city of cedar rapids. appeal from the supreme court of iowa. no. 786. decided may 18, 1959. .....
Judgment:
DEVRIES v. BAUMGARTNER'S ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO. - 359 U.S. 498 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court DEVRIES v. BAUMGARTNER'S ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO., 359 U.S. 498 (1959) 359 U.S. 498

DEVRIES ET AL. v. BAUMGARTNER'S ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.
No. 551.
Decided May 18, 1959.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 77 S. D. ___, 91 N. W. 2d 663.

Louis Sherman and Joseph M. Stone for petitioners.

Melvin T. Woods for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, ante, p. 236.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons set forth in the concurring opinion in San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, ante, pp. 236, 249.


ANDERSON v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, <a href="/99663"> 359 U.S. 498 </a> (1959) 359 U.S. 498 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court ANDERSON v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, 359 U.S. 498 (1959) 359 U.S. 498

ANDERSON ET AL. v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 786.
Decided May 18, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 250 Iowa ___, 93 N. W. 2d 216.

Ernest F. Pence and Roy A. Golden for appellants.

William M. Dallas for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 359 U.S. 498, 499




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //