Skip to content


Grocery Drivers Union Vs. Seven Up Bottling, Los Angeles - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number359 U.S. 434
AppellantGrocery Drivers Union
RespondentSeven Up Bottling, Los Angeles
Excerpt:
.....drivers union v. seven up bottling, los angeles - 359 u.s. 434 (1959) u.s. supreme court grocery drivers union v. seven up bottling, los angeles, 359 u.s. 434 (1959) 359 u.s. 434 grocery drivers union local 848 et al. v. seven up bottling co. of los angeles, inc. appeal from the supreme court of california. no. 169. decided may 4, 1959. appeal dismissed; certiorari granted; judgment vacated and cause remanded for modification. reported below: 49 cal. 2d 645, 320 p.2d 492. john c. stevenson, clarence e. todd and herbert m. ansell for appellants. thomas p. menzies and carl m. gould for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a.....
Judgment:
GROCERY DRIVERS UNION v. SEVEN UP BOTTLING, LOS ANGELES - 359 U.S. 434 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court GROCERY DRIVERS UNION v. SEVEN UP BOTTLING, LOS ANGELES, 359 U.S. 434 (1959) 359 U.S. 434

GROCERY DRIVERS UNION LOCAL 848 ET AL. v. SEVEN UP BOTTLING CO.
OF LOS ANGELES, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 169.
Decided May 4, 1959.

Appeal dismissed; certiorari granted; judgment vacated and cause remanded for modification.

Reported below: 49 Cal. 2d 645, 320 P.2d 492.

John C. Stevenson, Clarence E. Todd and Herbert M. Ansell for appellants.

Thomas P. Menzies and Carl M. Gould for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the cause remanded for modification in light of San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, ante, p. 236.

    Vacated and remanded.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 359 U.S. 434, 435




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //