Skip to content


Commercial Barge Lines, Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number359 U.S. 342
AppellantCommercial Barge Lines,
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
commercial barge lines, v. united states - 359 u.s. 342 (1959) u.s. supreme court commercial barge lines, v. united states, 359 u.s. 342 (1959) 359 u.s. 342 commercial barge lines, inc., et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of michigan. no. 721. decided april 27, 1959. 166 f. supp. 867, affirmed. dudley b. tenney and nuel d. belnap for appellants. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general hansen, robert w. ginnane and charlie h. johns for the united states and the interstate commerce commission, appellees. stuart b. bradley, carl helmetag, jr., j. d. feeney, harry c. ames, r. granville curry, frederick m. dolan, donald macleay and russell s. bernhard for carrier.....
Judgment:
COMMERCIAL BARGE LINES, v. UNITED STATES - 359 U.S. 342 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court COMMERCIAL BARGE LINES, v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 342 (1959) 359 U.S. 342

COMMERCIAL BARGE LINES, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF MICHIGAN. No. 721.
Decided April 27, 1959.

166 F. Supp. 867, affirmed.

Dudley B. Tenney and Nuel D. Belnap for appellants.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Robert W. Ginnane and Charlie H. Johns for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

Stuart B. Bradley, Carl Helmetag, Jr., J. D. Feeney, Harry C. Ames, R. Granville Curry, Frederick M. Dolan, Donald Macleay and Russell S. Bernhard for Carrier Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 359 U.S. 342, 343




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //