Skip to content


Friedman Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number359 U.S. 205
AppellantFriedman
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
friedman v. united states - 359 u.s. 205 (1959) u.s. supreme court friedman v. united states, 359 u.s. 205 (1959) 359 u.s. 205 friedman v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of new york. no. 675. decided march 30, 1959. 168 f. supp. 815, affirmed. irving d. friedman and sol friedman for appellant. solicitor general rankin and robert w. ginnane for the united states and the interstate commerce commission, appellees. joseph h. wright and erle j. zoll, jr. for railroad appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 359 u.s. 205, 206
Judgment:
FRIEDMAN v. UNITED STATES - 359 U.S. 205 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court FRIEDMAN v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 205 (1959) 359 U.S. 205

FRIEDMAN v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 675.
Decided March 30, 1959.

168 F. Supp. 815, affirmed.

Irving D. Friedman and Sol Friedman for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees. Joseph H. Wright and Erle J. Zoll, Jr. for railroad appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 359 U.S. 205, 206




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //