Skip to content


Teitelbaum Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number359 U.S. 206
AppellantTeitelbaum
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
.....of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 678. decided march 30, 1959. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 163 cal. app. 2d 184, 329 p.2d 157. morris lavine for appellant. stanley mosk, attorney general of california, william e. james, assistant attorney general, and herschel t. elkins, deputy attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied. turner v. kansas, 359 u.s. 206 (1959) 359 u.s. 206 (1959) "> u.s. supreme court turner v. kansas, 359 u.s. 206 (1959) 359 u.s. 206 turner et al. v. kansas. appeal from the.....
Judgment:
TEITELBAUM v. CALIFORNIA - 359 U.S. 206 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court TEITELBAUM v. CALIFORNIA, 359 U.S. 206 (1959) 359 U.S. 206

TEITELBAUM v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 678.
Decided March 30, 1959.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 163 Cal. App. 2d 184, 329 P.2d 157.

Morris Lavine for appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Herschel T. Elkins, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.


TURNER v. KANSAS, <a href="/99701"> 359 U.S. 206 </a> (1959) 359 U.S. 206 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court TURNER v. KANSAS, 359 U.S. 206 (1959) 359 U.S. 206

TURNER ET AL. v. KANSAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 688.
Decided March 30, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 183 Kan. 496, 328 P.2d 733.

Marvin E. Lewis for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 359 U.S. 206, 207




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //