Skip to content


Woody Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number359 U.S. 118
AppellantWoody
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
woody v. united states - 359 u.s. 118 (1959) u.s. supreme court woody v. united states, 359 u.s. 118 (1959) 359 u.s. 118 woody v. united states. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit. no. 135. argued january 14, 1959. decided march 23, 1959. judgment affirmed by an equally divided court. reported below: 258 f.2d 535 . clarence o. woolsey, acting under appointment by the court, 358 u.s. 802, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. beatrice rosenberg argued the cause for the united states. with her on the brief were solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general anderson and robert g. maysack. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. mr......
Judgment:
WOODY v. UNITED STATES - 359 U.S. 118 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court WOODY v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 118 (1959) 359 U.S. 118

WOODY v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 135.
Argued January 14, 1959.
Decided March 23, 1959.

Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Reported below: 258 F.2d 535 .

Clarence O. Woolsey, acting under appointment by the Court, 358 U.S. 802, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

Beatrice Rosenberg argued the cause for the United States. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson and Robert G. Maysack.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 359 U.S. 118, 119




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //