Skip to content


Ganger Vs. City of Miami - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number359 U.S. 64
AppellantGanger
RespondentCity of Miami
Excerpt:
..... ganger et al. v. city of miami. appeal from the supreme court of florida. no. 153. argued march 2-3, 1959. decided march 9, 1959. appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. reported below: 101 so.2d 116, 123. thomas h. anderson and herbert l. nadeau argued the cause for appellants. with them on the brief was clyde epperson. milton m. ferrell argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. townsend v. sain, 359 u.s. 64 (1959) 359 u.s. 64 (1959) "> u.s. supreme court townsend v. sain, 359 u.s. 64 (1959) 359 u.s. 64 townsend v. sain, sheriff, et al. on.....
Judgment:
GANGER v. CITY OF MIAMI - 359 U.S. 64 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court GANGER v. CITY OF MIAMI, 359 U.S. 64 (1959) 359 U.S. 64

GANGER ET AL. v. CITY OF MIAMI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 153.
Argued March 2-3, 1959.
Decided March 9, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.

Reported below: 101 So.2d 116, 123.

Thomas H. Anderson and Herbert L. Nadeau argued the cause for appellants. With them on the brief was Clyde Epperson.

Milton M. Ferrell argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.


TOWNSEND v. SAIN, <a href="/99713"> 359 U.S. 64 </a> (1959) 359 U.S. 64 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court TOWNSEND v. SAIN, 359 U.S. 64 (1959) 359 U.S. 64

TOWNSEND v. SAIN, SHERIFF, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 552, Misc.
Decided March 9, 1959.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

George N. Leighton and William R. Ming, Jr. for appellant.

Benjamin S. Adamowski for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded. United States ex rel. Jennings v. Ragen, Warden, 358 U.S. 276 .

Page 359 U.S. 64, 65




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //