Skip to content


Aho Vs. Jacobsen - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number359 U.S. 25
AppellantAho
RespondentJacobsen
Excerpt:
.....terminal operating co., 358 u.s. 354 , in light of kermarec v. compagnie generale transatlantique, 358 u.s. 625 . page 359 u.s. 25, 26 .....
Judgment:
AHO v. JACOBSEN - 359 U.S. 25 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court AHO v. JACOBSEN, 359 U.S. 25 (1959) 359 U.S. 25

AHO v. JACOBSEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 36.
Decided March 2, 1959.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded to the District Court for retrial on the admiralty side.

Reported below: 249 F.2d 309 .

George J. Engelman and Harry Kisloff for petitioner.

Paul R. Frederick for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for retrial on the admiralty side, Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co., 358 U.S. 354 , in light of Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U.S. 625 .

Page 359 U.S. 25, 26




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //