Skip to content


Brown-forman Distillers Corp. Vs. Collector of Revenue - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number359 U.S. 28
AppellantBrown-forman Distillers Corp.
RespondentCollector of Revenue
Excerpt:
.....revenue, 359 u.s. 28 (1959) 359 u.s. 28 brown-forman distillers corp. v. collector of revenue. appeal from the supreme court of louisiana. no. 142. decided march 2, 1959. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 234 la. 651, 101 so.2d 70. harry mccall for appellant. robert l. roland for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied. e t & w n c transportation co. v. currie, 359 u.s. 28 (1959) 359 u.s. 28 (1959) "> u.s. supreme court e t & w n c transportation co. v. currie, 359 u.s. 28 (1959) 359 u.s. 28 e t & w n c transportation co. v......
Judgment:
BROWN-FORMAN DISTILLERS CORP. v. COLLECTOR OF REVENUE - 359 U.S. 28 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court BROWN-FORMAN DISTILLERS CORP. v. COLLECTOR OF REVENUE, 359 U.S. 28 (1959) 359 U.S. 28

BROWN-FORMAN DISTILLERS CORP. v. COLLECTOR OF REVENUE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 142.
Decided March 2, 1959.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 234 La. 651, 101 So.2d 70.

Harry McCall for appellant.

Robert L. Roland for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.


E T & W N C TRANSPORTATION CO. v. CURRIE, <a href="/99719"> 359 U.S. 28 </a> (1959) 359 U.S. 28 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court E T & W N C TRANSPORTATION CO. v. CURRIE, 359 U.S. 28 (1959) 359 U.S. 28

E T & W N C TRANSPORTATION CO. v. CURRIE, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
OF NORTH CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 524.
Decided March 2, 1959.

248 N.C. 560, 104 S. E. 2d 403, affirmed.

Kester Walton and James H. Epps, Jr. for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, and Williams v. Stockham Valves & Fittings, Inc., 358 U.S. 450 .

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in these cases.

Page 359 U.S. 28, 29




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //