Skip to content


Rogers Vs. Calumet National Bank - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number358 U.S. 331
AppellantRogers
RespondentCalumet National Bank
Excerpt:
rogers v. calumet national bank - 358 u.s. 331 (1959) u.s. supreme court rogers v. calumet national bank, 358 u.s. 331 (1959) rogers v. calumet national bank no. 468 decided january 26, 1959 358 u.s. 331 on petition for writ of certiorari to the appellate court of indiana syllabus certiorari granted. a state court is without power to review the discretion exercised by the attorney general of the united states under federal law in connection with the issuance of a vesting order under the trading with the enemy act. 128 ind.app. 628, 149 n.e.2d 214, reversed and cause remanded. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. we are of the view that, under silesian-american corp. v. markham, .....
Judgment:
Rogers v. Calumet National Bank - 358 U.S. 331 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court Rogers v. Calumet National Bank, 358 U.S. 331 (1959)

Rogers v. Calumet National Bank

No. 468

Decided January 26, 1959

358 U.S. 331

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE

APPELLATE COURT OF INDIANA

Syllabus

Certiorari granted.

A state court is without power to review the discretion exercised by the Attorney General of the United States under federal law in connection with the issuance of a vesting order under the Trading with the Enemy Act.

128 Ind.App. 628, 149 N.E.2d 214, reversed and cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. We are of the view that, under Silesian-American Corp. v. Markham, 156 F.2d 793, 796, affirmed, 332 U. S. 469 , a state court is without power to review the discretion exercised by the Attorney General of the United States under federal law. The judgment is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded to the Appellate Court of Indiana. On remand, the Indiana courts are, of course, free to consider other questions presented by this record in light of General License 94, 12 Fed.Reg. 1457, as it may have affected the definition of "national" in Executive Order 9095, 7 Fed.Reg. 1971, as amended, and Executive Order 8389, 5 Fed.Reg. 1400. See GMO. Niehaus & Co. v. United States, 139 Ct.Cl. 605, 153 F.Supp. 428.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //