Skip to content


Bass Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number358 U.S. 333
AppellantBass
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
bass v. united states - 358 u.s. 333 (1959) u.s. supreme court bass v. united states, 358 u.s. 333 (1959) 358 u.s. 333 bass v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of virginia. no. 528. decided january 26, 1959. 163 f. supp. 1, affirmed. wilbert g. burnette for appellant. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general hansen, charles h. weston, w. louise florencourt, robert w. ginnane and carroll t. prince, jr. for the united states and the interstate commerce commission, appellees. linwood c. major, jr. for the atlantic greyhound corporation et al., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. lanza v. new.....
Judgment:
BASS v. UNITED STATES - 358 U.S. 333 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court BASS v. UNITED STATES, 358 U.S. 333 (1959) 358 U.S. 333

BASS v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF VIRGINIA. No. 528.
Decided January 26, 1959.

163 F. Supp. 1, affirmed.

Wilbert G. Burnette for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston, W. Louise Florencourt, Robert W. Ginnane and Carroll T. Prince, Jr. for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

Linwood C. Major, Jr. for the Atlantic Greyhound Corporation et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


LANZA v. NEW JERSEY, <a href="/99744"> 358 U.S. 333 </a> (1959) 358 U.S. 333 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court LANZA v. NEW JERSEY, 358 U.S. 333 (1959) 358 U.S. 333

LANZA v. NEW JERSEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 532.
Decided January 26, 1959.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 27 N. J. 516, 143 A. 2d 571.

Vito F. Lanza for appellant.

David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Bernard Hellring for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 358 U.S. 333, 334




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //