Skip to content


Cudd Vs. Mathers - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number358 U.S. 306
AppellantCudd
RespondentMathers
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of illinois. no. 520. decided january 19, 1959. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. charles s. rhyne for appellant. latham castle, attorney general of illinois, and raymond s. sarnow, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. lancaster security investment corp. v. kessler, 358 u.s. 306 (1959) 358 u.s. 306 (1959) "> u.s. supreme court lancaster security investment corp. v. kessler, 358 u.s. 306 (1959) 358 u.s. 306 lancaster security investment corp. v. kessler et al. appeal from the.....
Judgment:
CUDD v. MATHERS - 358 U.S. 306 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court CUDD v. MATHERS, 358 U.S. 306 (1959) 358 U.S. 306

CUDD v. MATHERS, JUDGE, NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 520.
Decided January 19, 1959.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Charles S. Rhyne for appellant.

Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, and Raymond S. Sarnow, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


LANCASTER SECURITY INVESTMENT CORP. v. KESSLER, <a href="/99747"> 358 U.S. 306 </a> (1959) 358 U.S. 306 (1959) "> U.S. Supreme Court LANCASTER SECURITY INVESTMENT CORP. v. KESSLER, 358 U.S. 306 (1959) 358 U.S. 306

LANCASTER SECURITY INVESTMENT CORP. v. KESSLER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 521.
Decided January 19, 1959.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 159 Cal. App. 2d 649, 324 P.2d 634.

Morris Lavine for appellant.

Gilbert E. Harris for Kessler et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 358 U.S. 306, 307




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //