Skip to content


Robertoy Vs. Michigan - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number364 U.S. 519
AppellantRobertoy
RespondentMichigan
Excerpt:
robertoy v. michigan - 364 u.s. 519 (1960) u.s. supreme court robertoy v. michigan, 364 u.s. 519 (1960) 364 u.s. 519 robertoy v. michigan. appeal from the supreme court of michigan. no. 308, misc. decided december 19, 1960. appeal dismissed since the judgment below is based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. petitioner pro se. paul l. adams, attorney general of michigan, and samuel j. torina, solicitor general, for respondent. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the supreme court of michigan, sought here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. page 364 u.s. 519, 520
Judgment:
ROBERTOY v. MICHIGAN - 364 U.S. 519 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court ROBERTOY v. MICHIGAN, 364 U.S. 519 (1960) 364 U.S. 519

ROBERTOY v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 308, Misc.
Decided December 19, 1960.

Appeal dismissed since the judgment below is based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.

Petitioner pro se.

Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, and Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Michigan, sought here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.

Page 364 U.S. 519, 520




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //