Skip to content


Kirschke Vs. City of Houston - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number364 U.S. 474
AppellantKirschke
RespondentCity of Houston
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of texas. no. 426. decided december 5, 1960. appeal dismissed since the judgment below is based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. bennett b. patterson for appellants. r. h. burks and homer t. bouldin for appellee. per curiam. the appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the supreme court of texas, sought here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. riela v. new york, 364 u.s. 474 (1960) 364 u.s. 474 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court riela v. new york, 364 u.s. 474 (1960) 364 u.s. 474 riela v. new york. appeal from the county court of tioga county, new york. no. 445. decided december 5, 1960. .....
Judgment:
KIRSCHKE v. CITY OF HOUSTON - 364 U.S. 474 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court KIRSCHKE v. CITY OF HOUSTON, 364 U.S. 474 (1960) 364 U.S. 474

KIRSCHKE ET AL. v. CITY OF HOUSTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 426.
Decided December 5, 1960.

Appeal dismissed since the judgment below is based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.

Bennett B. Patterson for appellants.

R. H. Burks and Homer T. Bouldin for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Texas, sought here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.


RIELA v. NEW YORK, <a href="/99780"> 364 U.S. 474 </a> (1960) 364 U.S. 474 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court RIELA v. NEW YORK, 364 U.S. 474 (1960) 364 U.S. 474

RIELA v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF TIOGA COUNTY, NEW YORK.
No. 445.
Decided December 5, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 7 N. Y. 2d 571, 166 N. E. 2d 840.

Louis Mansdorf for appellant.

George Boldman and Eliot H. Lumbard for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 364 U.S. 474, 475




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //