Skip to content


Beck Vs. Binks - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number364 U.S. 475
AppellantBeck
RespondentBinks
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the supreme court of illinois. no. 461. decided december 5, 1960. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 19 ill. 2d 72, 165 n. e. 2d 292. edwin s. d. butterfield for appellants. william l. guild, attorney general of illinois, and william c. wines and raymond s. sarnow, assistant attorneys general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied. kotrich v. county of dupage, 364 u.s. 475 (1960) 364 u.s. 475 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court kotrich v. county of dupage, 364 u.s. 475 (1960) 364 u.s. 475 kotrich et al. v. county of dupage,.....
Judgment:
BECK v. BINKS - 364 U.S. 475 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court BECK v. BINKS, 364 U.S. 475 (1960) 364 U.S. 475

BECK ET AL. v. BINKS, DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND
EDUCATION OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 461.
Decided December 5, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 19 Ill. 2d 72, 165 N. E. 2d 292.

Edwin S. D. Butterfield for appellants.

William L. Guild, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines and Raymond S. Sarnow, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.


KOTRICH v. COUNTY OF DuPAGE, <a href="/99781"> 364 U.S. 475 </a> (1960) 364 U.S. 475 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court KOTRICH v. COUNTY OF DuPAGE, 364 U.S. 475 (1960) 364 U.S. 475

KOTRICH ET AL. v. COUNTY OF DuPAGE, ILLINOIS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 473.
Decided December 5, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 19 Ill. 2d 181, 166 N. E. 2d 601.

Arthur Frankel, Nathan Glick and Lawrence E. Glick for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 364 U.S. 475, 476




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //