Skip to content


Pekao Trading Corp. Vs. Bragalini - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number364 U.S. 478
AppellantPekao Trading Corp.
RespondentBragalini
Excerpt:
pekao trading corp. v. bragalini - 364 u.s. 478 (1960) u.s. supreme court pekao trading corp. v. bragalini, 364 u.s. 478 (1960) 364 u.s. 478 pekao trading corp. v. bragalini et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 483. decided december 5, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 8 n. y. 2d 903, 168 n. e. 2d 823. arthur c. fink for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice frankfurter would note probable jurisdiction and hear the case, the more so inasmuch as the transactions which new york has taxed concerned foreign commerce, unlike those which were involved in northwestern states portland cement co. v......
Judgment:
PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINI - 364 U.S. 478 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINI, 364 U.S. 478 (1960) 364 U.S. 478

PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINI ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 483.
Decided December 5, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 8 N. Y. 2d 903, 168 N. E. 2d 823.

Arthur C. Fink for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER would note probable jurisdiction and hear the case, the more so inasmuch as the transactions which New York has taxed concerned foreign commerce, unlike those which were involved in Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, 358 U.S. 450 .

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is also of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 364 U.S. 478, 479




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //