Skip to content


Climate Control, Inc. Vs. Hill - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number364 U.S. 409
AppellantClimate Control, Inc.
RespondentHill
Excerpt:
.....al. appeal from the supreme court of arizona. no. 251. decided november 14, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 86 ariz. 180, 342 p.2d 854; 87 ariz. 201, 349 p.2d 771. william r. meagher for appellant. william w. stevenson, samuel h. morris, richard m. fennemore, daniel e. cracchiolo, j. a. riggins, jr., denison kitchel, francis j. ryley, ivan robinette, edward jacobson, howard twitty, john r. franks and richard g. kleindienst for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. bobo v. mayor & councilmen of savannah beach, 364 u.s. 409 (1960) 364 u.s. 409 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court bobo v......
Judgment:
CLIMATE CONTROL, INC. v. HILL - 364 U.S. 409 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court CLIMATE CONTROL, INC. v. HILL, 364 U.S. 409 (1960) 364 U.S. 409

CLIMATE CONTROL, INC., v. HILL ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 251.
Decided November 14, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 86 Ariz. 180, 342 P.2d 854; 87 Ariz. 201, 349 P.2d 771.

William R. Meagher for appellant.

William W. Stevenson, Samuel H. Morris, Richard M. Fennemore, Daniel E. Cracchiolo, J. A. Riggins, Jr., Denison Kitchel, Francis J. Ryley, Ivan Robinette, Edward Jacobson, Howard Twitty, John R. Franks and Richard G. Kleindienst for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BOBO v. MAYOR & COUNCILMEN OF SAVANNAH BEACH, <a href="/99797"> 364 U.S. 409 </a> (1960) 364 U.S. 409 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court BOBO v. MAYOR & COUNCILMEN OF SAVANNAH BEACH, 364 U.S. 409 (1960) 364 U.S. 409

BOBO v. MAYOR & COUNCILMEN OF SAVANNAH BEACH, GEORGIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA.
No. 409.
Decided November 14, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 216 Ga. 12, 114 S. E. 2d 374.

Erwin A. Friedman for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 364 U.S. 409, 410




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //