Skip to content


Ohio Vs. Shannon - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number364 U.S. 337
AppellantOhio
RespondentShannon
Excerpt:
.....here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. armco steel corp. v. michigan, 364 u.s. 337 (1960) 364 u.s. 337 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court armco steel corp. v. michigan, 364 u.s. 337 (1960) 364 u.s. 337 armco steel corp. v. michigan et al. appeal from the supreme court of michigan. no. 387. decided november 7, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 359 mich. 430, 102 n. w. 2d 552. paul r. trigg, jr. and robert d. dunwoodie for appellant. paul l. adams, attorney general of michigan, samuel j. torina, solicitor general, and william d. dexter, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is.....
Judgment:
OHIO v. SHANNON - 364 U.S. 337 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court OHIO v. SHANNON, 364 U.S. 337 (1960) 364 U.S. 337

OHIO EX REL. KING v. SHANNON, PRESIDING JUDGE, MUNICIPAL COURT OF
CINCINNATI, OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. No. 363.
Decided November 7, 1960.

Appeal dismissed because the judgment below is based on a non-federal ground adequate to support it.

Reported below: 170 Ohio St. 393, 165 N. E. 2d 642.

Allen Brown for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio, sought here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.


ARMCO STEEL CORP. v. MICHIGAN, <a href="/99802"> 364 U.S. 337 </a> (1960) 364 U.S. 337 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court ARMCO STEEL CORP. v. MICHIGAN, 364 U.S. 337 (1960) 364 U.S. 337

ARMCO STEEL CORP. v. MICHIGAN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 387.
Decided November 7, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 359 Mich. 430, 102 N. W. 2d 552.

Paul R. Trigg, Jr. and Robert D. Dunwoodie for appellant.

Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, and William D. Dexter, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 364 U.S. 337, 338




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //