Skip to content


Standard Dredging Corp. Vs. Alabama - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number364 U.S. 300
AppellantStandard Dredging Corp.
RespondentAlabama
Excerpt:
standard dredging corp. v. alabama - 364 u.s. 300 (1960) u.s. supreme court standard dredging corp. v. alabama, 364 u.s. 300 (1960) 364 u.s. 300 standard dredging corp. v. alabama. appeal from the supreme court of alabama. no. 332. decided october 24, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: ___ ala. ___, 122 so.2d 280. eberhard p. deutsch, rene h. himel, jr. and malcolm w. monroe for appellant. macdonald gallion, attorney general of alabama, guy sparks, special assistant attorney general, and william h. burton, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 364.....
Judgment:
STANDARD DREDGING CORP. v. ALABAMA - 364 U.S. 300 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court STANDARD DREDGING CORP. v. ALABAMA, 364 U.S. 300 (1960) 364 U.S. 300

STANDARD DREDGING CORP. v. ALABAMA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 332.
Decided October 24, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: ___ Ala. ___, 122 So.2d 280.

Eberhard P. Deutsch, Rene H. Himel, Jr. and Malcolm W. Monroe for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, Guy Sparks, Special Assistant Attorney General, and William H. Burton, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 364 U.S. 300, 301




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //