Skip to content


Rummel Vs. Musgrave - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number364 U.S. 293
AppellantRummel
RespondentMusgrave
Excerpt:
.....al. appeal from the supreme court of colorado. no. 303. decided october 17, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 142 colo. 249, 350 p.2d 825. fred m. winner for appellants. duke w. dunbar, attorney general of colorado, frank e. hickey, deputy attorney general, and john w. patterson, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. piccott v. florida, 364 u.s. 293 (1960) 364 u.s. 293 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court piccott v. florida, 364 u.s. 293 (1960) 364 u.s. 293 piccott v. florida. appeal from the supreme court of florida. no. 112, misc. .....
Judgment:
RUMMEL v. MUSGRAVE - 364 U.S. 293 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court RUMMEL v. MUSGRAVE, 364 U.S. 293 (1960) 364 U.S. 293

RUMMEL ET AL. v. MUSGRAVE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 303.
Decided October 17, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 142 Colo. 249, 350 P.2d 825.

Fred M. Winner for appellants.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John W. Patterson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


PICCOTT v. FLORIDA, <a href="/99809"> 364 U.S. 293 </a> (1960) 364 U.S. 293 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court PICCOTT v. FLORIDA, 364 U.S. 293 (1960) 364 U.S. 293

PICCOTT v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 112, Misc.
Decided October 17, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 116 So.2d 626.

Tobias Simon for petitioner.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 364 U.S. 293, 294




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //