Skip to content


Euziere Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number364 U.S. 282
AppellantEuziere
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
.....of appeals for the tenth circuit. no. 119, misc. decided june 27, 1960. certiorari granted; judgment vacated and case remanded. reported below: 266 f.2d 88 . petitioner pro se. solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general wilkey, beatrice rosenberg and robert g. maysack for the united states. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of elkins v. united states, ante, p. 206, decided this day. mr. justice frankfurter dissents on the basis of his dissenting opinion in rios v. united states, ante, p. 233, and elkins v. united states, ante, p. 233, decided this day. page 364 u.s......
Judgment:
EUZIERE v. UNITED STATES - 364 U.S. 282 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court EUZIERE v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 282 (1960) 364 U.S. 282

EUZIERE v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 119, Misc.
Decided June 27, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 266 F.2d 88 .

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Elkins v. United States, ante, p. 206, decided this day.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER dissents on the basis of his dissenting opinion in Rios v. United States, ante, p. 233, and Elkins v. United States, ante, p. 233, decided this day.

Page 364 U.S. 282, 283




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //