Skip to content


BERNSTEiN Vs. REAL ESTATE COMM'N - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number363 U.S. 419
AppellantBERNSTEiN
RespondentREAL ESTATE COMM'N
Excerpt:
bernstein v. real estate comm'n - 363 u.s. 419 (1960) u.s. supreme court bernstein v. real estate comm'n, 363 u.s. 419 (1960) 363 u.s. 419 bernstein et al. v. real estate commission of maryland et al. appeal from the court of appeals of maryland. no. 852. decided june 13, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 221 md. 221, 156 a. 2d 657. j. calvin carney and william h. murphy for appellants. c. ferdinand sybert, attorney general of maryland, and joseph s. kaufman, assistant attorney general, for appellee commission. melvin j. sykes for appellees allendale-lyndhurst improvement assn., inc., allen kleiman et ux. and bernard cherry et ux.; and david kimmelman of counsel for appellees kleiman.....
Judgment:
BERNSTEIN v. REAL ESTATE COMM'N - 363 U.S. 419 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court BERNSTEIN v. REAL ESTATE COMM'N, 363 U.S. 419 (1960) 363 U.S. 419

BERNSTEIN ET AL. v. REAL ESTATE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 852.
Decided June 13, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 221 Md. 221, 156 A. 2d 657.

J. Calvin Carney and William H. Murphy for appellants.

C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and Joseph S. Kaufman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Commission.

Melvin J. Sykes for appellees Allendale-Lyndhurst Improvement Assn., Inc., Allen Kleiman et ux. and Bernard Cherry et ux.; and David Kimmelman of counsel for appellees Kleiman and Cherry.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 363 U.S. 419, 420




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //