Skip to content


Senior Vs. Zoning Commission of New Canaan - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number363 U.S. 143
AppellantSenior
RespondentZoning Commission of New Canaan
Excerpt:
senior v. zoning commission of new canaan - 363 u.s. 143 (1960) u.s. supreme court senior v. zoning commission of new canaan, 363 u.s. 143 (1960) 363 u.s. 143 senior v. zoning commission of new canaan. appeal from the supreme court of errors of connecticut. no. 620. decided may 31, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 146 conn. 531, 153 a. 2d 415. raymond t. benedict, morgan p. ames, francis j. mcnamara, jr. and john f. spindler for appellant. ira e. hicks, norwick r. g. goodspeed, john c. sturges and samuel a. gilliland for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. garfinkle v......
Judgment:
SENIOR v. ZONING COMMISSION OF NEW CANAAN - 363 U.S. 143 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court SENIOR v. ZONING COMMISSION OF NEW CANAAN, 363 U.S. 143 (1960) 363 U.S. 143

SENIOR v. ZONING COMMISSION OF NEW CANAAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 620.
Decided May 31, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 146 Conn. 531, 153 A. 2d 415.

Raymond T. Benedict, Morgan P. Ames, Francis J. McNamara, Jr. and John F. Spindler for appellant.

Ira E. Hicks, Norwick R. G. Goodspeed, John C. Sturges and Samuel A. Gilliland for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


GARFINKLE v. GARFINKLE, <a href="/99878"> 363 U.S. 143 </a> (1960) 363 U.S. 143 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court GARFINKLE v. GARFINKLE, 363 U.S. 143 (1960) 363 U.S. 143

GARFINKLE v. GARFINKLE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 799, Misc.
Decided May 31, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 29 N. J. 506, 150 A. 2d 291.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 363 U.S. 143, 144




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //