Skip to content


Williams Vs. Lavallee - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number362 U.S. 637
AppellantWilliams
RespondentLavallee
Excerpt:
.....f.2d ___. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. sims motor transport lines, inc. v. united states, 362 u.s. 637 (1960) 362 u.s. 637 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court sims motor transport lines, inc. v. united states, 362 u.s. 637 (1960) 362 u.s. 637 sims motor transport lines, inc., v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 823. decided may 23, 1960. 183 f. supp. 113, affirmed. harold t. halfpenny and mary shaw for appellant. solicitor general rankin, acting assistant attorney general bicks, richard a. solomon, henry geller and robert w. ginnane for the united states and the interstate commerce commission. roland.....
Judgment:
WILLIAMS v. LAVALLEE - 362 U.S. 637 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court WILLIAMS v. LAVALLEE, 362 U.S. 637 (1960) 362 U.S. 637

WILLIAMS v. LAVALLEE, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 833, Misc.
Decided May 23, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Reported below: ___ F.2d ___.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.


SIMS MOTOR TRANSPORT LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/99888"> 362 U.S. 637 </a> (1960) 362 U.S. 637 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court SIMS MOTOR TRANSPORT LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 362 U.S. 637 (1960) 362 U.S. 637

SIMS MOTOR TRANSPORT LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 823.
Decided May 23, 1960.

183 F. Supp. 113, affirmed.

Harold T. Halfpenny and Mary Shaw for appellant.

Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Henry Geller and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

Roland Rice and Franklin R. Overmyer for Holland Motor Express, Inc., et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motions of Holland Motor Express, Inc., et al., for leave to be named parties appellee and for leave to file a motion to affirm are granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 362 U.S. 637, 1




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //