Skip to content


Yancy Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number362 U.S. 389
AppellantYancy
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
yancy v. united states - 362 u.s. 389 (1960) u.s. supreme court yancy v. united states, 362 u.s. 389 (1960) 362 u.s. 389 yancy v. united states. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit. no. 47. argued december 8-9, 1959. decided april 18, 1960. 252 f.2d 554 , affirmed by an equally divided court. seymour b. goldman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. john l. murphy argued the cause for the united states. on the brief were solicitor general rankin, assistant attorney general wilkey, robert s. erdahl and j. f. bishop. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. mr. justice stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page.....
Judgment:
YANCY v. UNITED STATES - 362 U.S. 389 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court YANCY v. UNITED STATES, 362 U.S. 389 (1960) 362 U.S. 389

YANCY v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 47.
Argued December 8-9, 1959.
Decided April 18, 1960.

252 F.2d 554 , affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Seymour B. Goldman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

John L. Murphy argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Robert S. Erdahl and J. F. Bishop.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 362 U.S. 389, 390




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //