Skip to content


CiTY OF COViNGTON, KENTUCKY Vs. PUBLiC SERV. COMM'N, KY - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number362 U.S. 215
AppellantCiTY OF COViNGTON, KENTUCKY
RespondentPUBLiC SERV. COMM'N, KY
Excerpt:
.....al. appeal from the court of appeals of kentucky. no. 628. decided march 21, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 327 s. w. 2d 954. charles s. rhyne and s. white rhyne, jr. for appellant. jerome m. alper for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. smith v. columbia county, 362 u.s. 215 (1960) 362 u.s. 215 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court smith v. columbia county, 362 u.s. 215 (1960) 362 u.s. 215 smith et al. v. columbia county, oregon, et al. appeal from the supreme court of oregon. no. 645. decided march 21, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial.....
Judgment:
CITY OF COVINGTON, KENTUCKY v. PUBLIC SERV. COMM'N, KY - 362 U.S. 215 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court CITY OF COVINGTON, KENTUCKY v. PUBLIC SERV. COMM'N, KY, 362 U.S. 215 (1960) 362 U.S. 215

CITY OF COVINGTON, KENTUCKY, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMM'N OF KENTUCKY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
No. 628.
Decided March 21, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 327 S. W. 2d 954.

Charles S. Rhyne and S. White Rhyne, Jr. for appellant.

Jerome M. Alper for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


SMITH v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, <a href="/99932"> 362 U.S. 215 </a> (1960) 362 U.S. 215 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court SMITH v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, 362 U.S. 215 (1960) 362 U.S. 215

SMITH ET AL. v. COLUMBIA COUNTY, OREGON, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 645.
Decided March 21, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 216 Ore. 662, 341 P.2d 540.

Robert T. Mautz for appellants.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Carlisle B. Roberts and Theodore W. deLooze, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 362 U.S. 215, 216




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //