Skip to content


Sublett Vs. Adams - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number362 U.S. 143
AppellantSublett
RespondentAdams
Excerpt:
.....362 u.s. 143 on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of appeals of west virginia syllabus petitioner applied to a state supreme court for writ of habeas corpus, charging that his confinement was in violation of the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment. that court refused the writ without either a hearing or a response from the state. held: the facts alleged entitle petitioner to a hearing under herman v. claudy, 350 u. s. 116 . certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. per curiam. the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the supreme court of appeals of west virginia......
Judgment:
Sublett v. Adams - 362 U.S. 143 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court Sublett v. Adams, 362 U.S. 143 (1960)

Sublett v. Adams

No. 406, Misc.

Decided March 7, 1960

362 U.S. 143

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT

OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

Syllabus

Petitioner applied to a State Supreme Court for writ of habeas corpus, charging that his confinement was in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. That Court refused the writ without either a hearing or a response from the State.

Held: the facts alleged entitle petitioner to a hearing under Herman v. Claudy, 350 U. S. 116 . Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Petitioner charged that he was being held in prison without lawful authority and in violation of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment. The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals refused the writ without either a hearing or a response from the State.

We hold that the facts alleged are such as to entitle petitioner to a hearing under Herman v. Claudy, 350 U. S. 116 . The judgment is vacated, and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //