Skip to content


New York Vs. Mccloskey - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number361 U.S. 534
AppellantNew York
RespondentMccloskey
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 563. decided february 23, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. reported below: 6 n. y. 2d 390, 160 n. e. 2d 647. gilbert s. rosenthal for appellant. eliot h. lumbard and nathan skolnik for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. national can corp. v. state tax commission of maryland, 361 u.s. 534 (1960) 361 u.s. 534 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court national can corp. v. state tax commission of maryland, 361 u.s. 534 (1960) 361 u.s. 534 national can corp. v. state tax commission of maryland. appeal from the court of appeals.....
Judgment:
NEW YORK v. McCLOSKEY - 361 U.S. 534 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court NEW YORK v. McCLOSKEY, 361 U.S. 534 (1960) 361 U.S. 534

NEW YORK EX REL. VALENTI v. McCLOSKEY, SHERIFF, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 563.
Decided February 23, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

Reported below: 6 N. Y. 2d 390, 160 N. E. 2d 647.

Gilbert S. Rosenthal for appellant.

Eliot H. Lumbard and Nathan Skolnik for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.


NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, <a href="/99952"> 361 U.S. 534 </a> (1960) 361 U.S. 534 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, 361 U.S. 534 (1960) 361 U.S. 534

NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 564.
Decided February 23, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 220 Md. 418, 153 A. 2d 287.

Herbert M. Brune for appellant.

C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and John Martin Jones, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 534, 535




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //