Skip to content


Siebel Vs. Department of Welfare of the City of New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number361 U.S. 535
AppellantSiebel
RespondentDepartment of Welfare of the City of New York
Excerpt:
..... appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 568. decided february 23, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 6 n. y. 2d 536, 161 n. e. 2d 1. albert oppido for appellant. seymour b. quel for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. bd., education, union free school dist. no. 3 v. allen, 361 u.s. 535 (1960) 361 u.s. 535 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court bd., education, union free school dist. no. 3 v. allen, 361 u.s. 535 (1960) 361 u.s. 535 board of education of union free school dist. no. 3 et al. v. allen, commissioner of education. appeal from the court of appeals.....
Judgment:
SIEBEL v. DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK - 361 U.S. 535 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court SIEBEL v. DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, 361 U.S. 535 (1960) 361 U.S. 535

SIEBEL v. DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 568.
Decided February 23, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 6 N. Y. 2d 536, 161 N. E. 2d 1.

Albert Oppido for appellant.

Seymour B. Quel for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BD., EDUCATION, UNION FREE SCHOOL DIST. NO. 3 v. ALLEN, <a href="/99953"> 361 U.S. 535 </a> (1960) 361 U.S. 535 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court BD., EDUCATION, UNION FREE SCHOOL DIST. NO. 3 v. ALLEN, 361 U.S. 535 (1960) 361 U.S. 535

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF UNION FREE SCHOOL DIST. NO. 3 ET AL. v. ALLEN,
COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 571.
Decided February 23, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 6 N. Y. 2d 871, 983; 160 N. E. 2d 119, 161 N. E. 2d 738.

John W. Burke for appellants.

Charles A. Brind for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 361 U.S. 535, 536




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //