Skip to content


Higgins Vs. State Bar of California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number361 U.S. 538
AppellantHiggins
RespondentState Bar of California
Excerpt:
.....from the supreme court of california. no. 389, misc. decided february 23, 1960. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. appellant pro se. herman f. selvin for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. ryan v. tinsley, 361 u.s. 538 (1960) 361 u.s. 538 (1960) "> u.s. supreme court ryan v. tinsley, 361 u.s. 538 (1960) 361 u.s. 538 ryan v. tinsley, warden. appeal from the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit. no. 490, misc. decided february 23, 1960. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. page 361 u.s. 538, 1 .....
Judgment:
HIGGINS v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA - 361 U.S. 538 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court HIGGINS v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, 361 U.S. 538 (1960) 361 U.S. 538

HIGGINS v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 389, Misc.
Decided February 23, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Herman F. Selvin for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


RYAN v. TINSLEY, <a href="/99956"> 361 U.S. 538 </a> (1960) 361 U.S. 538 (1960) "> U.S. Supreme Court RYAN v. TINSLEY, 361 U.S. 538 (1960) 361 U.S. 538

RYAN v. TINSLEY, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 490, Misc.
Decided February 23, 1960.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 361 U.S. 538, 1




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //