Skip to content


Superior Court Vs. Yellow Cab - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number361 U.S. 373
AppellantSuperior Court
RespondentYellow Cab
Excerpt:
.....of petitioners. per curiam. the judgment is reversed. san diego building trades council v. garmon, 359 u.s. 236 . page 361 u.s. 373, 374 .....
Judgment:
SUPERIOR COURT v. YELLOW CAB - 361 U.S. 373 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court SUPERIOR COURT v. YELLOW CAB, 361 U.S. 373 (1960) 361 U.S. 373

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY ET AL. v. WASHINGTON EX REL.
YELLOW CAB SERVICE, INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. No. 76.
Argued January 20, 1960.
Decided January 25, 1960.

53 Wash. 2d 644, 333 P.2d 924, reversed.

Richard P. Donaldson argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Samuel B. Bassett.

Kenneth A. Cox argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Herbert S. Little and Warren R. Slemmons.

Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli and Florian J. Bartosic filed a brief for the National Labor Relations Board, as amicus curiae, in support of petitioners.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236 .

Page 361 U.S. 373, 374




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //