Skip to content


Mitchell Vs. Oregon Frozen Foods Co. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number361 U.S. 231
AppellantMitchell
RespondentOregon Frozen Foods Co.
Excerpt:
mitchell v. oregon frozen foods co. - 361 u.s. 231 (1960) u.s. supreme court mitchell v. oregon frozen foods co., 361 u.s. 231 (1960) 361 u.s. 231 mitchell, secretary of labor, v. oregon frozen foods co. et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 33. argued november 17, 1959. decided january 11, 1960. in view of ambiguities in the record as to the issues, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted. reported below: 254 f.2d 116 . bessie margolin argued the cause for petitioner. with her on the brief were solicitor general rankin, wayne g. barnett, harold c. nystrom and sylvia s. ellison. martin p. gallagher argued the cause for respondents. with him on the brief was orval yokom. .....
Judgment:
MITCHELL v. OREGON FROZEN FOODS CO. - 361 U.S. 231 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court MITCHELL v. OREGON FROZEN FOODS CO., 361 U.S. 231 (1960) 361 U.S. 231

MITCHELL, SECRETARY OF LABOR, v. OREGON FROZEN FOODS CO. ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
No. 33.
Argued November 17, 1959.
Decided January 11, 1960.

In view of ambiguities in the record as to the issues, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Reported below: 254 F.2d 116 .

Bessie Margolin argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Wayne G. Barnett, Harold C. Nystrom and Sylvia S. Ellison.

Martin P. Gallagher argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Orval Yokom.

Edward Brown Williams filed a brief for the National Association of Frozen Food Packers, as amicus curiae, in support of respondents.

PER CURIAM.

In view of ambiguities in the record as to the issues sought to be tendered, made apparent in oral argument and the memoranda of counsel subsequently filed at the Court's request, the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 361 U.S. 231, 232




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //