Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air act 1981 Page 1 of about 288,622 results (0.149 seconds)

Mar 29 2005 (HC)

Oil Country Tubular Ltd. Vs. A.P. Pollution Control Board and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(3)ALD95; 2005(3)ALT715

..... disposal system after having established such industry, operation process or treatment or disposal system is not traceable to any of the provisions contained under any of the acts including the water act, 1974 and the air act, 1981. hence, insisting on such a consent is one without jurisdiction. if such a consent is held to be obtained every year, then collecting the said fee ..... expeditiously. the judgment dated 31.8.2002 passed by the appellate authority is assailed in this writ petition.3. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the water act, 1974 and air act, 1981 do not cover all kinds of discharge or emission of pollutants, but they cover only such discharge or emission of pollutants which are above the prescribed levels and thus ..... has obtained noc for establishment of its factory and also consent for commencement of its operation. what is required to be examined is whether the provisions of the water act, 1974 and the air act, 1981 obligate the petitioner to renew the consent periodically, say year after year. it is the contention of the petitioner that it does not come within the purview of ..... memorandum dated 27.9.1988, government of india, ministry of environment, forests and wild life. consent fee for establishment and operation, renewal of industrial units under the water act, 1974 and the air act, 1981 has been fixed by the government under g.o. ms no. 157 efs&t;, dated 22.11.1997. the petitioner did not choose to challenge the above referred memorandum .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 1995 (HC)

Shri Dahyabhai Kalubhai Solanki Vs. N.J. Industries and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1996CriLJ2787; (1996)1GLR768

..... both these appeals against the order of acquittal for the offence under section 39 read with section 40 of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act. 1981 (for short, 'the air act. 1981).2. it was alleged against the respondent accused persons that they did not provide port holes, platforms conveniently located ..... in absence of production of either the gazette or any of the newspapers, would not bring home the charge under sections. 39 and 40 of the air act, 1981.7. in this connection, in the case of gujarat pollution control board. gandhinagar v. rushabh industries. ahmedabad. reported in 1995 (2) glr 1082 ..... from chimney in the industrial units of the respondents-accused and thereby committed offences punishable under section 39 read with section 40 of the air act, 1981. the complaint is lodged against the accused persons on basis of the default data-sheet at exh. 5 and on basis of ..... impugned order of acquittal, held that the complainant board failed to prove that the ahmedabad area was declared as an air pollution control area under section 19 of the air act, 1981, in asmuch as the recognition was not by reference to a map or by publication in the official gazette ..... mr. sanjay gupta, learned advocate appearing for the appellant-board conceded that the board did not prove that the ahmedabad area was declared as air pollution control area by producing the official gazette in which such declaration was published, nor any of local newspapers wherein any such declaration was .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 20 2014 (TRI)

Ram Singh and Others Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary, Ministr ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... ), of the air act, 1981, in our opinion the spcb has rightly therefore enforced the closure of the mines against all the three lease holders. we therefore find no merit in the contention of the ..... the operations are carried out in accordance with law by observing the terms and conditions of the mining lease and terms and conditions of the 'consent to operate' under the air act, 1981 they were entitled to operate the same. so soon as the non-observance of the conditions were noticed and the spcb having given show-cause notice under section 31(a ..... being observed and accordingly a show-cause notice was issued on 25th march, 2014 for revocation of the 'consent to operate' under the provisions of section 31(a) of the air act, 1981. 4. the matter was heard on 22nd april, 2014 after the notice period expired on 10th april, 2014 and it was directed that in case the deficiencies as pointed out ..... observations with regard to the compliance of the condition of the 'consent to operate' and the mining leases as well as the observance of the provisions of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981, the officials of the state pollution control board had issued show-cause notices to the lessee of ml no. 200/2004 with a copy of the inspection .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 1993 (HC)

Gujarat Water Pollution Control Board Vs. Kohinoor Dyeing and Printing ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1993)2GLR1368

..... - - - 4 2 2 3 6 5 28 6 56jt. court, rajpipla - - - - - - - - nil - - - - 1 - - - 1bhavnagarj.m.f.c, rajpipla - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - - - - - - nilkutchc.j.m., bhuj - - - - - 1 - - 1 - - - - - - - - -1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________name of the air act, 1981 | water act, 1974----------------------------- -- |--------------------------------------court 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 total| 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 total_____________________________________________________________________________________________junagadhc.j.m., junagadh - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - 2 3veraval court - - - - - - 1 - 1 - 1 ..... - - - - - 2 - - 2jt. j.m.f.c., jetpur- - - - - - - - nil - - - - 1 3 5 1 10j.m.f.c., upleta - - - - - - - - nil - - 2 - - - - - 2j.m.f.c., vankaner - - - - - - - - nil - - 2 - - - - - 2___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________name of the air act, 1981 | water act, 1974----------------------------- -- |---------------------------------------court 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 total| 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 total_______________________________________________________________________________________________sabarkantha - - - - - - - - nil - - - - - - - - nilsuratc.j.m., surat - - 2 17 33 3 3 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2014 (TRI)

Krishna Stone Crushers and Others Vs. Haryana State Pollution Control ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... to which the unit has failed to comply :- i) not submitting operation schedule of the stone crusher. ii) unit has not submitted analysis report under air act, 1981. iii) not meeting the siting parameters as per notification dated 18.12.1997. the appellants have contended that they had been granted noc in the year ..... consent case of your unit was put up before blc (upper) meeting held on 27.02.2012 as per the decision of refuse your consent under air act 1981 for the year 2011-12 as you have failed to comply the following observations: 1. not submitted operation schedule of the stone crusher. 2. unit ..... by the board that you have nothing to say in this matter and this communication may then be treated as the legal refusal of your consent under air act, 1981 for the year 2011-12. regional officer yamuna nagar endst no. hspcb/ymn/2011/ a copy of the above is forwarded to the chairman, haryana ..... crusher, vill doiwala, chhachhrouli, yamuna nagar subject:- show cause notice for refusal of consent under section 21/22 of air act, 1981 for the year 2011-12. kindly refer to your consent application under air act, 1981 for the year 2011-12 and this office letter no. hspcb/ymn/2011/4234 dated 02.02.2012 on the subject ..... under misconception and misrepresentation of true and material facts to you, may not be revoked and why your unit be closed down as per provisions of air act, 1981. in view of the above, you are hereby given scn for closure for 15 days as to why your unit should not be closed and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2008 (HC)

Dipendra Mohan Sen and ors. and Voice of People and anr. Vs. the State ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2008)2CALLT139(HC),2008(1)CHN1017

..... .39. in our opinion, the board has collected the environmental data in performance of its statutory functions. section 30 of the air act, 1981 provides that any document purporting to be a report signed by a government analyst or as the case may be, a state ..... in section 17 of the act. it is the duty of the state board to perform inter ..... control of pollution) act, 1974. under the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 the state board which has been established under the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974 would also be the state board for the purposes of the air act, 1981. powers and functions of the state board under the air act are set out ..... well as the pcb have failed to perform their statutory functions. making a reference of section 22 of the air act, 1981 learned counsel submitted that the state boards has failed to carry out its functions and ensure that there is no increase of ..... of the opinion that the permission granted to the guild is violative of provisions of the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974, the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981, environment protection act, 1986, environment (protection rules), 1986 and noise pollution (regulation and control) rules, 2000.44. we, therefore, allow the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2013 (SC)

G. Sundarrajan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... eia notification of 1994. further it was pointed out that all projects having environmental implications required previous consent to establish and to operate under the water act, 1974 and air act, 1981 from the state pollution control board and unless those consents are existing, plant cannot said to have all clearances from the state pcbs as required by the explanation ..... also pointed out that the above stipulations would be in force amongst others under the water act, 1974, the air act, 1981 and the environment (protection) act, 1986 and the rules thereunder, hazardous wastes (management and handling) rules, 1989 and its rules, the public liability insurance act, 1991 and its amendment. 155. npcil submitted yet another application dated 19.11.2009 ..... of 1994, it was submitted that the project did not obtain all clearances including noc from the state pollution control board, which was required under the water act of 1974 and air act of 1981. project, therefore, did not have noc, from the pollution control board, when 1994 notification came into effect. no fresh environmental clearance was obtained from ..... in the interest of environmental protection. 6. the stipulations will be implemented among others, under the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974, the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 and the environment (protection) act, 1986. 129. moef has a duty to see that the above-mentioned conditions are fully complied; which has also dealt with the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2013 (SC)

G.Sundarrajan Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the eia notification of 1994. further it was pointed out that all projects having environmental implications required previous consent to establish and to operate under the water act, 1974 and air act, 1981 from the state pollution control board and unless those consents are existing, plant cannot said to have all clearances from the state pcbs as required by the ..... also pointed out that the above stipulations would be in force amongst others under the water act, 1974, the air act, 1981 and the environment (protection) act, 1986 and the rules thereunder, hazardous wastes (management and handling) rules, 1989 and its rules, the public liability insurance act, 1991 and its amendment.155. npcil submitted yet another application dated 19.11.2009 for ..... of 1994, it was submitted that the project did not obtain all clearances including not from the state pollution control board, which was required under the water act of 1974 and air act of 1981. project, therefore, did not have noc, from the pollution control board, when 1994 notification came into effect. no fresh environmental clearance was obtained from moef ..... in the interest of environmental protection.6. the stipulations will be implemented among others, under the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974, the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981 and the environment (protection) act, 1986. 129. moef has a duty to see that the above-mentioned conditions are fully complied; which has also dealt with the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 1995 (HC)

ishwar Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1996P& H30

..... . in case any of the stone crushers were found to be not meeting the parameters of the aforesaid notifications, appropriate action would be taken as per provisions of air act, 1981. it is submitted that in the notification dated 9-6-1992, siting parameters for location of the stone crushers were fixed whereas in the notification of 4-8-1992 ..... under section 5 of the environment. (protection) act, 1986, shall stop functioning/ operating with immediate effect. (6) the delhi development authority through its vice-chairman and commissioner ( ..... justice and accelerating the pace of realisation of the constitutional objective 'law', as pointed out by justice krishna lyer in fertilizer corporation kamgar union v. union of india, air 1981 sc 344, is a social auditor and this audit function can be put into action when some one with real public interest ignites the jurisdiction. a fear is ..... administration (regulations and development) act, 1971 or from any other authority which the law requires, shall stop functioning and operating with immediate effect. (5) the stone crushers, in respect of which closure orders/directions have been issued by the central pollution control board under section 31-a of air (prevention and control ofpollution) act, 1981 or by the central government .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 2014 (TRI)

Vinesh Madanaya Kalwal Vs. State of Maharashtra the Collector, Chandra ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... at respondent no. 3 industry and the board had issued notices/directions etc. based on such results and even, forfeited bg on some occasions. similarly, mpcb has issued directions under air act, 1981 to the respondent no. 4 from time to time, and have reported higher dust concentrations at some locations in their premises. this has been challenged by the respondent no. 4 ..... therefore, the tribunal records its finding on issue no.2 framed above, in affirmative. 19. the air act, 1981, is designed to prevent control and abatement of air-pollution; the provisions relate to preservation of quality of air and control of pollution. keeping in view these objects, the act has provided for measures, which are preventive in nature, in the cases of industries to be established ..... . precisely it is for such reason, the industry, which has been given consent, is required to comply with certain conditions, enumerated in sub-section (5) of section 21 of the air act, 1981. non-compliance of these conditions and directions under 31 (a) is made punishable under section 37. the primary responsibility of controlling the ..... air-pollution is on the state board. subsection (2) of section 23 of air act, 1981 casts a duty on the board to cause such remedial measures as are 1 necessary to mitigate the emission of air pollutants, and the expenses that are incurred can be recovered from the person concerned .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //