Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: array array Page 1 of about 200,037 results (0.088 seconds)

Jan 20 2012 (SC)

Vodafone International Holdings B.V. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of the entire share capital of cgp which it held through htihl (bvi) for vih. further, htil also agreed to procure the assignment of loans owed by cgp and array holdings limited [array for short] (a 100% subsidiary of cgp) to hti (bvi) finance ltd. (a direct subsidiary of htil). as part of its obligations, htil undertook to procure that ..... hel, resulting in holding of 2.34% interest in the indian company hel. htil could, therefore, exercise its control over hel, through the voting rights of its indirect subsidiary array (mauritius) which in turn controlled 42% shares through mauritian subsidiaries in hel. mauritian subsidiaries controlled 42% voting rights in hel and htil could not however exercise voting rights as stated ..... which htil could make best use of its investments and exercise control over and strategically influence the affairs of hel. htil in its commercial wisdom noticed the disadvantage of preferring array, which would have created problems for htil. hutchison teleservices (india) mauritius had a subsidiary, namely 3gspl which carried on the call centre business in india and the transfer ..... subsidiaries. the said report evidences that at the negotiation stage, parties had in mind the transfer of an upstream company rather than the transfer of hel directly. the transfer of array had the advantage of transferring control over the entire shareholding held by downstream mauritius companies (tier i companies), other than gspl. on the other hand, the advantage of transferring .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2015 (HC)

Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Private Limited Vs. Hatim Ali and An ...

Court : Delhi

..... board of directors of cgp but of course, vodafone could appoint or remove members of the board of directors of cgp. on acquisition of cgp from htil, array became an indirect subsidiary of vodafone. array is also a separate legal entity managed by its own board of directors. 355. share of cgp situates in the cayman islands and that of ..... , array, may exercise control over the subsidiaries, whether a wos or otherwise by influencing the voting rights, nomination of members of the ..... array in mauritius. mauritian entities which hold 42% shares in hel became the direct and indirect subsidiaries of array, on vodafone purchasing the cgp share. voting rights, controlling rights, right to manage, etc., of mauritian companies vested in ..... those companies. htil has never sold nor has vodafone purchased any shares of either array or the mauritian subsidiaries, but only cgp, the share of which situates in the cayman islands....... 357. mauritian entities being a wos of array, array as a holding company can influence the shareholders of various mauritian companies. holding companies like cgp .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2015 (HC)

Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Private Limited Vs. Aseem Takyar

Court : Delhi

..... board of directors of cgp but of course, vodafone could appoint or remove members of the board of directors of cgp. on acquisition of cgp from htil, array became an indirect subsidiary of vodafone. array is also a separate legal entity managed by its own board of directors. 355. share of cgp situates in the cayman islands and that of ..... , array, may exercise control over the subsidiaries, whether a wos or otherwise by influencing the voting rights, nomination of members of the ..... array in mauritius. mauritian entities which hold 42% shares in hel became the direct and indirect subsidiaries of array, on vodafone purchasing the cgp share. voting rights, controlling rights, right to manage, etc., of mauritian companies vested in ..... those companies. htil has never sold nor has vodafone purchased any shares of either array or the mauritian subsidiaries, but only cgp, the share of which situates in the cayman islands....... 357. mauritian entities being a wos of array, array as a holding company can influence the shareholders of various mauritian companies. holding companies like cgp .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 1993 (HC)

Sri Kotla Vijayabhaskara Reddy and ors. Vs. Smt. Renuka Choudary

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1993(3)ALT568

..... decision in jyothi basu's case (17 supra) immaneni panduranga rao, j., allowed the said application and directed deletion of the name of the chief election commission from the array of parties in the election petition.114. sri s. ramachandra rao, learned counsel appearing for the election petitioner contended, relying upon the provision of section 87 of 'the act ..... requested that the names of the respective respondents for whom they are appearing should be struck off from the array of parties.107. sri s. ramachandra rao, learned counsel appearing for the election petitioner strenuously contended that specific allegations of corrupt practice have been levelled against the respondents 9 ..... reddy, learned standing counsel for central government, filed application no. 531 of 1993 for a similar relief viz., to strike out the name of the ninth respondent from the array of parties. the other counsel though did not file independent applications, adopted the arguments of learned counsel m/s. c. padmanabha reddy, innayya reddy and learned advocate general and ..... innayya reddy, learned standing counsel for central government, respectively seeking to strike out the names of their clients viz., respondents 10 to 12,15 and 9th respondent from the array of parties on the ground that they are not at all necessary parties to the election petition. sri k. venkatramaiah appearing for 14th respondent, sri pradyumna kumar reddy, appearing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Khushalo Vs. Muhammad HusaIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1888)ILR10All223

..... . indeed, those difficulties and inconveniences increase, and have the effect of prolonging litigation, when attempts are made to adjudicate upon the rights of parties arrayed on the same side, whether in a court of first instance or a court of appeal.65. opposed to the view of the law which i ..... section 367 of the code are not applicable because the defendants-appellants are alive, and being dealt with as plaintiffs for the purposes of the array of parties, no dispute has arisen as to who is the proper legal representative. and what we have to consider is whether musammat khushalo has ..... word 'suit' an appeal.'46. in this view of the matter, the points before us become very simple, because, for the purposes of the array of the parties, section 582 read with section 587 of the civil procedure code renders the provisions of chapter xxi of the code relating to incidental proceedings arising from ..... with profound respect for the rulings which i have cited; and with equally profound respect i may observe that the whole difficulty in connection with the array of parties has arisen out of a misapprehension of the juristic principles upon which our code of civil procedure is based. a due consultation of ..... of one and the same question and require consideration of the same portions of the civil procedure code. that question is, whether, for the purposes of the array of the parties incident upon the death of either of the parties to an appeal, the provisions of section 582 are such as require us to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 12 1988 (HC)

United Commercial Bank Vs. Dharam Paul Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1989HP56

..... the above reasons, the applications in question are allowed to the extent that it is ordered that the name of shri vinod kumar, defendant 2, be struck off from the array of defendants and in his place, his legal representatives be made parties. on the facts of this case, the plaintiff is further directed to amend his plaint so as to ..... the plaintiff-bank would for all times keep itself informed as to whether he is alive or not. the fact that the suit was filed and the said defendant was arrayed as a defendant shows that the plaintiff-bank took, defendant 2 to be alive on that date. when it: came to know that his death, the applications under consideration were ..... the array of the parties without bringing on record his legal representatives. if so, there is no conceivable reason why the legal representatives of defendant 2 should not be added as parties ..... against those legal representatives on the day he moves an application for making them parties.it has to be borne in mind that as many as three defendants were originally arrayed in the suit and further that the right to sue would survive against the other two defendants even if the name of defendant 2 is ordered to be struck from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2013 (HC)

S.Balasubramanian Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... no one can be condemned, without affording sufficient opportunity to defend, which means, a company can be punished for any offence committed under the industrial disputes act only by arraying the company as an accused and after affording opportunity to the said company. without making the company as an accused and without affording any opportunity to the company, if any ..... made a scientific analysis of a number of earlier judgments of the hon'ble supreme court, ultimately held that a company cannot be indicted, either expressly or impliedly, without arraying the company as an accused and without affording sufficient opportunity to the company to defend the charges. by holding so, the hon'ble supreme court acquitted the directors of ..... been made liable for prosecution without being impleaded as an accused and whether the directors could have been prosecuted for offences punishable under the aforesaid provisions without the company being arrayed as an accused.".12. before the hon'ble supreme court, the consideration was in respect of section 141 of the negotiable instruments act, which reads as follows:- ".141. ..... primary question, which came up for consideration was, when the person committing an offence is a company, whether prosecution of the directors and other persons responsible for the management, without arraying the company as an accused, is maintainable ?.".. in paragraph no.3 of the said judgment, the hon'ble supreme court has framed the question as follows:- ".3. the core .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2018 (SC)

Manju Surana Vs. Ratan Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... clear that if a situation arises where investigation is directed under section 156(3) of the cr.p.c. and some material comes to light to array respondent no.1 as an accused, our order would not come in the way.49. the application is accordingly allowed, leaving the parties to bear their ..... mis-description of name, which can be corrected. it cannot be the stand of the appellant that willy-nilly somehow, respondent no.1 must remain arrayed as an accused in those proceedings, even though the proceedings before the magistrate are at the stage of only whether there should be a direction for ..... secretary, phed. in fact, the officer working as the principal secretary, phed has not been arrayed as a respondent. there is no allegation made against the secretary/principal secretary to page 25 of 30 the chief minister. the allegation is of ..... grievance over the actions of the principal secretary, public health and engineering department (phed) in which capacity respondent no.1 is stated to have been arrayed. it is averred in the application that respondent no.1 was serving as a secretary and principal secretary to the chief minister and not as principal ..... minister.5. the special judge closed the complaint in terms of order dated 4.2.2014 on account of the fact that the accused persons arrayed as page 3 of 30 respondents are either public servants or have remained as public servants and no prior sanction has been granted by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 2013 (HC)

Blueberry Books and ors. Vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... these are two applications under order i rule 10 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 ( cpc ) seeking deletion of defendants 1 and 3 respectively from the array of parties.2. the background to these applications is that the aforementioned suit has been filed by m/s blueberry books, plaintiff no.1, mr. ashish gupta, ..... activity complained of. it is submitted that defendant no.1 is, therefore, not a necessary or proper party to the suit and accordingly may be deleted from the array of parties.11. ia no.7707 of 2012 has been filed by defendant no.3, research in motion india pvt. ltd. ( rimpl ), on more or less ..... it is accordingly submitted that defendant no.3, rimpl, is neither a necessary nor a proper party to the suit and, therefore, may be deleted from the array of parties.13. replies have been filed by the plaintiffs to both these applications. in the reply filed to ia no.7706 of 2012, it is stated ..... ca in india.27. on the same lines, defendant no.10 has filed the present application, ia no.13852 of 2012 seeking its deletion from the array of parties. it is pointed out that the plaint fails to state any material fact disclosing any infringement in india of the plaintiffs copyright by defendant no. ..... no.10 is neither a necessary nor a proper party to the suit. the application is accordingly allowed. defendant no.10 is directed to be deleted from the array of parties. ia no.7821 of 2013 (under order i rule 10 cpc) 36. this is an application on behalf of defendant no.5 apple india pvt .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2014 (HC)

High Court of Karnataka, Represented by the Registrar General and Othe ...

Court : Karnataka

..... visited the deendhar anjuman ashram situated at asifnagar, hyderabad. this accused is convicted for the offence of conspiracy by the hyderabad court and he was arrayed as accused no.45 in that case. 378. p.w-5-mohd. zia ur rehman was working in education department as first division assistant ..... . this flimsy creed was prevalent even before among rare communities without any basis. when it was realized that this issue has a potential to array an anti islamic group, they began to give it leverage. and in this way they aroused antimuslim sentiments amongst their nation. when the moghal ..... proposition is that there need not be the pomp and pageantry usually associated with war such as the offenders forming themselves in battle line and arraying in a warlike manner. even a stealthy operation to overwhelm the armed, or other personnel deployed by the government and to attain a commanding position ..... proposition is that there need not be the pomp and pageantry usually associated with war such as the offenders forming themselves in battle-line and arraying in a war like manner. even a stealthy operation to overwhelm the armed or other personnel deployed by the government and to attain a ..... and by defiance of government troops or armed personnel deployed to maintain public tranquility. the number of force, the manner in which they are arrayed, armed or equipped is immaterial. even a limited number of persons who carry powerful explosives and missiles without regard to their own safety can cause .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //