Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: calcutta police act 1866 Court: andhra pradesh state consumer disputes redressal commission scdrc hyderabad Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 42 results (0.043 seconds)

Aug 29 2011 (TRI)

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Aug-29-2011

..... having purchased the same under hire purchase agreement from opposite party no.1. while so on 24-8-2005 the vehicle was damaged in an accident. on a report, the police registered the case in crime no.64. when the vehicle was taken to autofin limited, secunderabad, it has given estimate for rs.3,17,848/-. when he made a claim ..... it may be noted that the conditions of a private car policy and commercial vehicle policy are completely different. in view of the provisions of section 64vb of the insurance act, it may not be possible for us to regularize the policy by collecting the premium at this stage. it has been pointed out to you on various occasions that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2011 (TRI)

Smt. G. Neelamma and Another Vs. Gopal Reddy and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Jul-21-2011

..... contained in section 19(1) of the act. in that case since the primary liability being on the employer and the amount was determined the high court obviously by invoking its jurisdiction directed the commissioner for workmens ..... was held that ??includes the insurance company concerned. it is therefore obvious that if the insurance company has agreed to discharge the liability of the employer under workmens compensation act, the liability of insurance company to indemnify the insurer shall have to be determined by the commissioner for workmens compensation in the very same proceedings by virtue of provisions ..... subsequent occasion. it cannot be suspended. liability of the insurance company: if the insurance company has agreed to discharge the liability of the employer under the workmens compensation act the liability of the insurance company to indemnify the insurer shall have to be determined by the commissioner for workmens compensation in the very same proceedings by virtue of the ..... employee meets with an accident. its object is that unscrupulous employer should not take advantage of the ignorance of the employee in making payment of a paltry sum. therefore the act safeguards the interest of the workers and any private payment will not discharge the statutory obligation. 13) in rajak haji jumma vs. united india insurance company ltd. reported .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2011 (TRI)

The Branch Manager National Insurnace Company Ltd. and Another Vs. Sye ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Jul-26-2011

..... separately from 1982 and that he married another woman yavarunnisa begum. on the fateful day the deceased was called by the complainant, and the police registered a criminal case against him u/s 302 and 201 ipc. the complainant himself has taken several policies from all the insurance companies including ..... c. no. 178/2002. the learned sessions judge mentioned: ?? in the investigation it was disclosed that the accused was a retired inspector of police and the deceased was working as a school teacher in govt. girls high school, narayanpet of mahaboobnagar dist. the accused who is not happy with ..... was also registered against him. by forging signatures of his wife, he obtained various policies, and later killed her and he being a police officer got the criminal cases acquitted basing on the failure of prosecution to establish the case. after a lapse of 9 years he issued notice ..... subsequently killed her and got the sessions case acquitted, and therefore he was not entitled to any amount as per section 45 of the insurance act. the dist. forum had neither territorial jurisdiction or pecuniary jurisdiction, and therefore prayed that the complaint be dismissed. 7) during the course of ..... a conclusion. at the outset, we may state that rules of evidence of the evidence act or the procedure contemplated under cr.p.c. have no application while dealing the cases under the consumer protection act. the principles applicable are principles of natural justice, equity and good conscience etc. be that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2011 (TRI)

M/S Kusalava Finance Ltd., Rep. by Its Manager Sri K. Koteswara Rao Vs ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Jan-24-2011

..... they had collected the installments amount from the complainant for and on behalf of the opposite party no.1, sec.11(c) of the c.p.act would come into operation whereunder the cause of action conferring jurisdiction on the district forum is provided for. therefore, any question relating to the jurisdiction aspect ..... their part. 3. the opposite party no.1 has contended that as a counter blast to the proceedings initiated under sec.138a of the negotiable instruments act, the complainant has filed the complaint. it was contended that the complainant had impleaded the opposite party no.2 as the branch office of the opposite ..... towards full and final settlement of his loan account was dishonored for insufficient funds in his account. the opposite party no.1 initiated proceedings under sec.138a of ni act. 2. the complainant contended that he has paid `1,07,850/- to sm cars, chennai and the opposite parties instead of a sum of `92,000 ..... no.3 to 5 from the complainant for and on behalf of the opposite party no.1. 10. section 11 of the c.p.act deals with the jurisdiction of the district forum and it reads as under: 11.jurisdiction of the district forum. ??(1) subject to the other provisions ..... of this act, the district forum shall have jurisdiction to entertain complaints where the value of the goods or services and the compensation, if any, claimed ''does .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 2011 (TRI)

Dr.M.Vishnuvardhan Reddy Vs. Bathula Buramma and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Oct-10-2011

..... the application. aggrieved by the said order, opposite party no.1 preferred the revision contending that he is a government doctor not liable to be prosecuted under the consumer protection act, 1986 in his individual capacity and if at all liable it is the government that is liable and it was not made a party. r3 was impleaded in order to ..... act, 1986 are summary in nature and provisions of c.p.c., cr.p.c. and evidence act have no application while adjudicating the matter. unnecessary delay would occasion if truncated orders are passed. it will lead to unnecessary time consuming and multiplication ..... the revision petitioner can as well file his written version, taking all these pleas and insist that the matter be disposed in the statutory period fixed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for disposal of the complaint, more so, in view of the fact that the proceedings under the consumer protection .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2011 (TRI)

The Managing Director Madhupala Estates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. D. Vijaya Saradh ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Sep-21-2011

..... deeds. it asked to choose another plot 8 kms away. when it threatened with dire consequences if they come to their office on that she gave a report to the police which was registered as a case in crime no. 1134/2007 on 2.10.2007. therefore she sought registration of the plot or in the alternative refund the amount, and ..... .2001 it never cancelled the said allotment nor cancelled the membership on the ground that it was already sold away. it was not informed to the complainant. it did not act fairly when the complainant had insisted for registration of sale deed under legal notice. it gave reply stating that ?? my client states that your client has paid the sale consideration .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 2011 (TRI)

G. Sreenivasulu Reddy Vs. the Manager Ing Vysya Bank Ltd. and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Jul-20-2011

..... of op3 bank for consideration. thus it was not a consumer qua op3 bank. therefore for alleged negligence/deficiency in service, no liability can be fasted under the consumer protection act merely on the ground that op3 collecting bank having sent the cheques for collection. ? 12) honble supreme court in sonic surgical vs. national insurance company ltd., reported in (2010) 1 ..... scc 135 held that simply because the expression ??branch office in section 17(2)(b) of the consumer protection act would mean branch office where cause of action has arisen but not each and every branch office of opposite party wherever it is situated. that was a somewhat similar case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 2011 (TRI)

Mahanthi Lakshmana Rao and Another Vs. State Bank of India Rep. by Bra ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Dec-12-2011

..... maturity of the policy is 6-09-2021. no paid up value or maturity benefits are available under the policy except the exemption under section 80 of the income tax act,1881. after the insurance policy is issued , premium cannot be refunded nor policy can be cancelled. without disclosing the pendency of complaint before the banking ombudsman, the appellants filed the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2011 (TRI)

Canara Bank, Shivajinagar Branch, Nizamabad Rep.by Its Branch Manager ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Dec-05-2011

..... to the first respondent by registered post on 16-08-2008 who is entitled to initiate proceedings against the drawer of the cheque under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act in addition to other civil remedies available. 7. it is contended that the first respondent re-presented the cheque on 20-09-2008 and it was sent on the same .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 2011 (TRI)

Sri Madhula Kasi Rao and Another Vs. Sri M.Maheswara Rao and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Oct-12-2011

..... in kapula uppada panchayat of bheemunipatnam mandal. exs.a1 and a2 are dt.27.2.02. the 6th opp.party arrayed herein is the police officers association and opp.parties 1 to 3 are the president, secretary and treasurer respectively of this association. opposite parties 4 and 5 are ..... /- each to the complainants opposite parties 1 to 3 and5filed counter denying the allegations made by the complainants and contending that employees of the police department formed an association for the welfare of the employees. fourth opposite party as president of the said association collected an amount of rs.44 ..... complainants are in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said sites from the date of purchase. on 27.2.2002 opp.party no.4 representing police officers association, visakhapatnam as its president and other opp.parties received a sum of rs.44,000/- each from the complainants (stating that rs. ..... h) to (j) it is therefore to be held that such obligation constitutes ??service ?? and comes within the meaning of section 2(o) of the act. the execution of sale deed being an integral part is also ??service ? . from the afore mentioned judgement we are of the considered opinion that it ..... to form a new society to take care of the welfare of the police personnel and accordingly a new society was formed with name and style as ??visakha city police housing colony residential welfare association ? registered under societys act and opp.parties 1 to 3 were elected as president, secretary and treasurer .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //