Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: calcutta police act 1866 Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 65 results (0.060 seconds)

Jan 20 2011 (HC)

S.Ramu Vs. Govt.OfA.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-20-2011

..... is apt to extract here section 17 of pc act, which reads thus: "17 persons authorized to investigate:- notwithstanding anything contained in the code. of criminal procedure, 1973, no police officer below the rank,-- (a) in the case of the delhi special police establishment, of an inspector of police, (b) in the metropolitan areas of bombay, calcutta, madras and ahmedabad and in any other metropolitan ..... area notified as such under sub-section (1) of s.8 of code of criminal procedure, 1973 of an assistant commissioner of police (c) elsewhere, of a deputy superintendent of police or a police officer of equivalent rank, shall investigate any offence punishable under this act without the order of a ..... crime registered in 1992 was to the effect: "in exercise of powers conferred by the provisions on me, under section 17 of the prevention of corruption act, 1988, i p. k. runwal. superintendent of police, special police establishment, division-1 lokayukt karyalaya, gwalior division gwalior (m. p.) authorised shri d. s. rana insp- (spe) lak-gwl (m. p.) to investigate crime no. ..... warrants.19. in view of the same, i do not see any merit in the contention advanced by the learned senior counsel that the inspector of police is not authorized under section 17 of the pc act to register the crime and investigate into the matter. 20. in m.c.mehta's case (3 supra) the supreme court monitored the investigation, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2011 (TRI)

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Pramod Kumar Chaturvedi an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Aug-29-2011

..... having purchased the same under hire purchase agreement from opposite party no.1. while so on 24-8-2005 the vehicle was damaged in an accident. on a report, the police registered the case in crime no.64. when the vehicle was taken to autofin limited, secunderabad, it has given estimate for rs.3,17,848/-. when he made a claim ..... it may be noted that the conditions of a private car policy and commercial vehicle policy are completely different. in view of the provisions of section 64vb of the insurance act, it may not be possible for us to regularize the policy by collecting the premium at this stage. it has been pointed out to you on various occasions that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2011 (TRI)

Smt. G. Neelamma and Another Vs. Gopal Reddy and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Jul-21-2011

..... contained in section 19(1) of the act. in that case since the primary liability being on the employer and the amount was determined the high court obviously by invoking its jurisdiction directed the commissioner for workmens ..... was held that ??includes the insurance company concerned. it is therefore obvious that if the insurance company has agreed to discharge the liability of the employer under workmens compensation act, the liability of insurance company to indemnify the insurer shall have to be determined by the commissioner for workmens compensation in the very same proceedings by virtue of provisions ..... subsequent occasion. it cannot be suspended. liability of the insurance company: if the insurance company has agreed to discharge the liability of the employer under the workmens compensation act the liability of the insurance company to indemnify the insurer shall have to be determined by the commissioner for workmens compensation in the very same proceedings by virtue of the ..... employee meets with an accident. its object is that unscrupulous employer should not take advantage of the ignorance of the employee in making payment of a paltry sum. therefore the act safeguards the interest of the workers and any private payment will not discharge the statutory obligation. 13) in rajak haji jumma vs. united india insurance company ltd. reported .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2011 (HC)

Greater Hyderabad Municipal Employees

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-09-2011

..... individual household towards service charge. it also authorizes collection of similar service charges from the commercial establishments as per the guidelines of the commissioner. under section 197 of the ghmc act, 1955, the corporation can impose certain taxes like- tax on lands and buildings; octroi; tax on vehicles; taxes on animals and boats; taxes on advertisements; tax on ..... agency to collect money from household people or from commercial establishments for the primary collection of garbage. according to the learned counsel, there is no provision under the ghmc act, 1955 providing for imposing service charge on the household people or commercial establishments either by ghmc or by a private agency authorized by the municipal corporation. the learned ..... must relate to the municipalities or panchayats as mentioned in the definition.18. in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 3, 6 and 25 of the environment (protection) act, 1986, the central government made the msw rules, 2000 to regulate the management and handling of msws. by virtue of these rules, every municipality is responsible for collection, ..... clear that either the municipal servants or the contractors can be entrusted the work of scavenging and cleansing in all streets and premises. therefore, under chapter xiv of the act, the commissioner can discharge his functions with regard to sanitary provisions through municipal servants or entrusting the same to the contractors. the contention of the learned counsel for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 2011 (TRI)

Mahanthi Lakshmana Rao and Another Vs. State Bank of India Rep. by Bra ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Dec-12-2011

..... maturity of the policy is 6-09-2021. no paid up value or maturity benefits are available under the policy except the exemption under section 80 of the income tax act,1881. after the insurance policy is issued , premium cannot be refunded nor policy can be cancelled. without disclosing the pendency of complaint before the banking ombudsman, the appellants filed the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2011 (TRI)

The Managing Director Madhupala Estates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. D. Vijaya Saradh ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Sep-21-2011

..... deeds. it asked to choose another plot 8 kms away. when it threatened with dire consequences if they come to their office on that she gave a report to the police which was registered as a case in crime no. 1134/2007 on 2.10.2007. therefore she sought registration of the plot or in the alternative refund the amount, and ..... .2001 it never cancelled the said allotment nor cancelled the membership on the ground that it was already sold away. it was not informed to the complainant. it did not act fairly when the complainant had insisted for registration of sale deed under legal notice. it gave reply stating that ?? my client states that your client has paid the sale consideration .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 2011 (TRI)

G. Sreenivasulu Reddy Vs. the Manager Ing Vysya Bank Ltd. and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Jul-20-2011

..... of op3 bank for consideration. thus it was not a consumer qua op3 bank. therefore for alleged negligence/deficiency in service, no liability can be fasted under the consumer protection act merely on the ground that op3 collecting bank having sent the cheques for collection. ? 12) honble supreme court in sonic surgical vs. national insurance company ltd., reported in (2010) 1 ..... scc 135 held that simply because the expression ??branch office in section 17(2)(b) of the consumer protection act would mean branch office where cause of action has arisen but not each and every branch office of opposite party wherever it is situated. that was a somewhat similar case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2011 (TRI)

Canara Bank, Shivajinagar Branch, Nizamabad Rep.by Its Branch Manager ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Dec-05-2011

..... to the first respondent by registered post on 16-08-2008 who is entitled to initiate proceedings against the drawer of the cheque under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act in addition to other civil remedies available. 7. it is contended that the first respondent re-presented the cheque on 20-09-2008 and it was sent on the same .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 2011 (TRI)

Sri Madhula Kasi Rao and Another Vs. Sri M.Maheswara Rao and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Oct-12-2011

..... in kapula uppada panchayat of bheemunipatnam mandal. exs.a1 and a2 are dt.27.2.02. the 6th opp.party arrayed herein is the police officers association and opp.parties 1 to 3 are the president, secretary and treasurer respectively of this association. opposite parties 4 and 5 are ..... /- each to the complainants opposite parties 1 to 3 and5filed counter denying the allegations made by the complainants and contending that employees of the police department formed an association for the welfare of the employees. fourth opposite party as president of the said association collected an amount of rs.44 ..... complainants are in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said sites from the date of purchase. on 27.2.2002 opp.party no.4 representing police officers association, visakhapatnam as its president and other opp.parties received a sum of rs.44,000/- each from the complainants (stating that rs. ..... h) to (j) it is therefore to be held that such obligation constitutes ??service ?? and comes within the meaning of section 2(o) of the act. the execution of sale deed being an integral part is also ??service ? . from the afore mentioned judgement we are of the considered opinion that it ..... to form a new society to take care of the welfare of the police personnel and accordingly a new society was formed with name and style as ??visakha city police housing colony residential welfare association ? registered under societys act and opp.parties 1 to 3 were elected as president, secretary and treasurer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2011 (TRI)

M/S. Navya Chaitanya Housing (P) Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing Director V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Nov-29-2011

..... record that the opposite party did not cancel the membership of the complainant nor refunded the amount and therefore the cause of action as per article 54 of the limitation act is continuing as the date of limitation begins from the date on which the agreement is cancelled which in the instant case did not take place. therefore we are of ..... notice was sent to the opposite party it was returned as ??addressee left without instructions. it is the last known address and as per section 28(a) of c.p.act notice is served on the last known address and there are no instructions given by the opposite party, it is deemed to be served. except for stating that the company .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //