Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: calcutta police act 1866 Court: kolkata Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 427 results (0.053 seconds)

Jan 31 2011 (HC)

Anuj Agarwal and Anrs. Vs. the Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Kolkata Appellate

Decided on : Jan-31-2011

..... a case cbi/spe/bs & fc/rc bsk 204 dated 17.12.2004 was registered against mihir kanti mazumdar, the then branch manager, uco bank, beck bagan branch, calcutta (2) anup mukherjee, the then chief officer(credit), regional office, uco bank, kolkata. 3) pankaj shah, 4) sarat kobi, 5) ravi kataruka, 6) manoj todi ..... the allegations in the f.i.r. do not constitute a cognizable offence but constitute only a non-cognizable offence, no investigation is permitted by a police officer without an order of a magistrate as contemplated under section 155(2) of the code4.5. where the allegations made in the fir or complaint ..... in the first information report and other materials, if any, accompanying the f.i.r. do not disclose a cognizable offence, justifying an investigation by police officers under section 156(1) of the code except under an order of a magistrate within the purview of section 155(2) of the code.3. ..... read with section 13(2) and 13(1) (d) of the prevention of corruption act.5) the present petitioners anuj agarwal and umesh chandra agarwal filed an application before the learned judge-in-charge, 3rd special court, calcutta on 05.02.2009 praying for their discharge/acquittal from the case.6) the learned ..... ors. under sections 420,467,468,471/120 b of the ipc read with section 13(2) and 13(1) (d) of the prevention of corruption act.4) it was alleged that during the period 2000-2002 mihir kanti mazumder entered into a conspiracy with private person such as pankaj shah, sarat kobi, ravi .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2011 (HC)

Ranabir Saha Vs. the State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Kolkata Appellate

Decided on : Jan-28-2011

..... employment) scheme, 1970 in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the dock workers (regulation of employment) act, 1948. it also appears that by resolution no. 137 dated 25.03.1965 the calcutta dock labour board has accepted the recommendation of the sub-committee taken at its meeting held on 2nd and 5th february, 1965 in ..... place on record any document before this court to show that at the material point of time the chairman, calcutta port trust was empowered to act as chairman of the calcutta dock labour board and as such was the appointing and disciplinary authority of the calcutta dock labour board. 26. in such sanction order shri roy has not mentioned that such sanction was accorded ..... any authority lower than the appointing authority. 23. thus, from a plain reading of the dock workers (regulations of employment) act, 1948 and the rules and schemes framed by the calcutta dock labour board thereunder it appears to me that the calcutta dock labour board is the appointing authority as well as the disciplinary authority of its executive officer like the present petitioner ..... employee by the appointing authority. therefore, the next relevant question is to decide who is the appointing authority of the calcutta dock labour board. 18. it appears that unlike the major port trusts act, 1963 the dock workers (regulation of employment) act, 1948 was passed for the purpose of constitution and function of dock labour board to be established under section 5a thereof .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 2011 (HC)

Kirsten Distributors Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Respondent

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-16-2011

..... holding meetings of shareholders of the applicant companies including publication of advertisement in the newspapers, sending formal notice to shareholders, convening the formal meetings of the shareholders, publication in the calcutta gazette are dispensed with. 5. summons be signed as on date. the matter is made returnable on march 23, 2011. special officer and all parties concerned including the department are ..... scheme of amalgamation. 3. the special officer shall meet the equity shareholders on march 21, 2011 at 4.30 p.m. at 12, old post post office street, 2nd floor, calcutta - 700001 or at any other convenient place and shall file his report on march 23, 2011. the special officer will be paid remuneration assessed at rs.15,000/-. 4. in ..... . both companies are closely held. 2. however a meeting has to be held of the said shareholders of the respective applicant companies in accordance with section 391 of the companies act, 1956. in my opinion such meeting can be informal dispensing with all formalities. mr. n.c. roy choudhury, senior advocate and barrister-at-law be appointed as a special officer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 2011 (HC)

Pandraj Kunjilal Sadh (Deceased) and Rai Kumar Sadh Vs. Santosh Kumari ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-24-2011

..... section 57 applies, no high court, in exercise of the concurrent jurisdiction hereby conferred over any local area beyond the limits of the towns of calcutta, madras and bombay *** shall, where the deceased is a hindu, muhammadan, buddhist, sikh or jaina or an exempted person, receive applications for probate ..... probate proceeding was initiated in this high court on the allegation that the deceased had left an immoveable property situate at 1a, indian mirror street, calcutta, within the jurisdiction of this court. in the application for revocation, various points were taken including the genuineness of the said will. however, the ..... in the exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction, the words as respects the city of calcutta as defined in the city civil court act, 1953, the city civil court established under that act shall be substituted. 1912 4 indian lunacy act, 1912. (1) in clause (1) of section 25, for the words high ..... further provided that its provisions shall not apply to any will made, or any intestacy occurring, before 1- 1-1866. 22. by the hindu wills act, 1870 (for short the 1870 act), statutory provisions were made to regulate the wills of hindus, jainas, sikhs and buddhists in the lower provinces of ..... succession to the property of any hindu, buddhist, sikh or jaina; nor shall they apply to any will made before the first day of january, 1866. (2) save as provided in sub-section (1) or by any other law for the time being in force, the provisions of this part .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2011 (HC)

Ms. East Coast TradefIn Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-11-2011

..... all the views including the view of the apex court in k. bhaskarans case (supra). 18. in m. natarajan v. state by inspector of police, spe, cbi, acb, chennai, reported in 2008 (3) scc (cri) 507, it was held; ..once this court had noticed the observations ..... alipore. the demand notice was sent by advocate having its office within the territorial jurisdiction of metropolitan magistrate court at calcutta and it was sent through general post office, calcutta. the letter was addressed to the drawer who is residing within the jurisdiction of the court situated under the district ..... within the jurisdiction of metropolitan magistrate court, excepting sending the notice through the general post office situated within the metropolitan area of calcutta city. the question is whether this fact simplicitor gives jurisdiction to the metropolitan magistrate to entertain the petition of complaint or not ..... validity and propriety of the order dated 28.3.2008 passed by the learned metropolitan magistrate, 11th court, calcutta in c.1980 of 2007 under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act whereby the learned court found that it has no jurisdiction to try the present case and discharged the ..... a finding that sending of demand notice from a particular place wherein other ingredients constituting an offence under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act are done at a different place, does not provide territorial jurisdiction with the court of that particular place because giving of notice does .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2011 (HC)

Moloy Kumar Das. Vs. Krishna Chandra Adhikari and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-13-2011

..... or occupation in a permanent way, he must not evict without serving the aforesaid notice. all parties concerned including the special officer and the officer-incharge of the local police station are to act on a signed xerox copy of this order on the usual undertaking. 6. on may 5, 2006, the learned special officer pursuant to the above order having dispossessed ..... accepted. b) the ld. special officer be directed to immediately deliver possession of the entire premises no.11, mathur sen garden lane, calcutta- 700006 to such highest offerer in a full vacant condition after acceptance of the offer, with police help if necessary; c) the petitioner as shabait of the trust estate be given liberty to enter into a proper development agreement ..... the special officer to deliver possession of the entire premises in question to the appellant after acceptance of his offer with police help. his lordship while refusing such prayer restrained the appellant and the applicant under section 34 of the act as well as the special officer from transferring or alienating any portion of the building and land appertained thereto to anyone ..... to that to appoint your petitioners younger son chinmoy adhikary to act as a trustee; ii) liberty to given to the shebait of the aforesaid debuttar estate to deal with the present occupiers of 11, mathur sen garden lane, calcutta and to evict the trespassers therefrom with the help of the local police of the jorabagan p.s. and if necessary a special .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2011 (HC)

Durshi Chand Agarwal. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata Appellate

Decided on : Mar-23-2011

..... was made on 27.7.2009 at 13.45 hours. on the same date, the officials of kalighat police station had been to 49, gurupada haldar road, calcutta 26, and examined megha who disclosed everything to the officers of kalighat police station. deepak was arrested and these petitioners were reported to have been left for rajasthan. megha was medically examined at sambhu nath ..... , the de facto complainant, with oblique motive dragged these two petitioners in another case simply in order to harass them. megha acted peculiarly because she, after lodging the fir in tollygunge police station, filed a suit under section 9 of hindu marriage act praying for restoration of her conjugal rights which, however, was withdrawn subsequently. mr. bagchi has drawn attention of this court ..... case no. 140 of 2009 dated 26.7.2009 under sections 498 a/406/34 of the indian penal code and under section 3/ 4 dowry prohibition act is filed at the instance of durshi chand agarwal and raj kumari agarwal, the accused no. 2 and 3. 2) megha agarwal wife of deepak agarwal (accused no.1 in ..... as accused together with others and the fact that the de facto complainant filed a suit under section 9 of hindu marriage act and also filed a case under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violation act, 2005. 9) mr. maitra, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2 contended that while considering the prayer for quashing of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 2011 (HC)

Rasika Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-29-2011

..... the purpose of immediately proceeding to seal the shop room by the name of danish music corner and the hotel by the name of danish hotel at 7, lenin sarani, calcutta 13. the receiver will make an inventory of all items in the shop room and will not permit any item to be removed without previous leave of court. 3. the ..... name of danish music corner and the hotel by the name of danish hotel. 5. the receiver will be entitled to obtain police assistance for such purpose and the deputy commissioner of kolkata police, central through the officer-in-charge of the local police station will render all assistance and ensure that this order is strictly complied with. 6. all parties and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2011 (HC)

Brigadier Prabir Kumar Sanyal. Vs. Mrs. Mohsena Chowdhury

Court : Kolkata Appellate

Decided on : Mar-15-2011

..... to discharge the accused by rejecting the complaint. he relied on a decision of this court reported in all india reporter (volume-37) 1950 calcutta page-339(lalmohan singh vs- the king)11. mr.kasem ali ahmed learned counsel appearing for the state adopted the argument made by mr moitra ..... status in the locality which was lowered down in the estimation of right thinking people of the society in view of such act on the part of the military police. hence the accused committed offence under section 441/504/506/427/500 of the indian penal code.4. being aggrieved by ..... committed any crime under the aforesaid provisions he could be prosecuted for such offence. significantly to note that the process server and/or the military police who went to the house of the petitioner were not made accused.15. in my view, the petitioner of complaint was nothing but an ..... the said complaint, mohsena also contended that while her husband was at kalimpong she was occupying her civil accommodation with her son, a school acting boy. she alleged that although the other officers were extended official accommodation, she had to leave the official accommodation and move to her private ..... colonel chowdhury was allotted an official accommodation at tusf view hastings calcutta where he over stayed. the authority issued a notice under section 7(3) of the public premises (eviction of unauthorized occupants) act 1971 issued by the petitioner then acting as estate officer. it was alleged that the petitioner directed the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 2011 (HC)

Hdfc Bank Ltd. Vs. the State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Kolkata Appellate

Decided on : Feb-23-2011

..... impugned proceeding has been initiated on the basis of a letter of complaint submitted by the opposite party no.2/complainant before i.c., jadavpore police station, calcutta, on 21.01.2009 alleging therein that his car bearing no. wb 02u/2790 was snatched away by five local goons while it has ..... the petitioner that the petitioner being incorporated under the companies act, 1956, having its office at calcutta, is being represented by sri sachin kumar gupta, deputy manager (legal). jadavpore police station case no. 40 dated 21.01.2009 has been registered for investigation on the basis of ..... for investigation on the basis of the complaint lodged by the opposite party no. 2, the complainant, with the inspector-in-charge of jadavpur police station alleging therein about the commission of offences punishable under sections 341/323/379 of the indian penal code by unknown persons and it has ..... b.g.r. case no. 353 of 2009 pending before the court of learned additional chief judicial magistrate, alipore, and the corresponding proceeding of jadavpore police station case no. 40 dated 21.01.2009 under sections 341/323/ 379 of the indian penal code. 2. it is the case of ..... a letter of complaint lodged by the opposite party no. 2 with the inspector-in-charge of jadavpore police station .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //